Editorial: Florida's 'conscience' vaccine exemption arrives right on cue for measles
Published in Op Eds
You can’t make this stuff up: Florida lawmakers are going to reconsider a proposal to expand vaccine exemptions for school children just as the state is battling a measles outbreak with 145 cases so far, the fourth-highest number in the nation.
Legislators have already spoken on this issue: During the regular session earlier this year, they rejected the “Medical Freedom Act.” The Senate passed the bill, sponsored by Jacksonville Republican Sen. Clay Yarborough; the House didn’t take it up, wisely letting it die.
But Gov. Ron DeSantis, not content to let a bad and dangerous idea fade away, added it to the agenda for the special session that starts Tuesday. The session will now include an effort to redraw Florida congressional districts that many in DeSantis’ own Republican Party think is too risky; a proposal to regulate artificial intelligence that lawmakers also failed to pass in the regular session and a push to expand vaccine exemptions for school children.
Will lawmakers have enough sense to say no to the vaccine issue a second time? We fervently hope so. Vaccines are critical. Measles can be deadly or have long-lasting consequences, especially for young children. Legislators will literally have children’s lives in their hands.
If the comments from House Speaker Daniel Perez of Miami on a Sunday TV program are any indication, skepticism about the proposal remains high:
“My concern with the vaccines is, you know, in the middle of a measles outbreak it’s tough for me to all of a sudden allow for children in schools to not have the measles vaccine, to not have polio, to not have chicken pox,” he said on Local 10’s This Week in South Florida. “You know, these are all things that have, for the most part, been eradicated, except for some having a comeback here with measles.”
The proposal to be considered next week is expected to be similar or identical to Yarborough’s original bill, SB 1756, which would allow parents to claim a “conscience exemption” to opt their children out of required school vaccines. In other words, parents could refuse to vaccinate their children for almost any reason.
Florida already allows exemptions for medical or religious reasons. Couching this latest attack on vaccines as an issue of “conscience” fails to consider the other part of the equation: those who could get infected by unvaccinated children. That includes babies too young to get the vaccine and others with compromised immune systems.
When a parent chooses not to vaccinate their child against an illness as contagious and serious as measles, they aren’t just risking their own family. They’re risking the health of people all around them. If there’s an issue of conscience to be considered, surely that should be it.
Consider this, too: Florida’s childhood vaccination rates have continued to drop, with the rate for Florida kindergartners now around 88% for the second school year in a row. In 2016, the rate was as high as 94%. To achieve “herd immunity,” when enough people are vaccinated to stop the spread of disease, you need about a 95% rate of vaccination.
But what do we expect in a state where the governor and the surgeon general, Joseph Ladapo, have vowed to end all state vaccine requirements for kids attending school, a list that includes shots that protect against measles-mumps-rubella, polio, chickenpox and Hepatitis B?
DeSantis loves to tout the wonders of the “free state of Florida” — especially as he looks for his next job once his term ends — but freedom can only go so far without infringing on the freedoms of others.
Florida lawmakers were right the first time. Children need vaccines, especially for measles. The Legislature should be turning its attention to true issues facing the state, such as property insurance costs or the need for housing. Instead, lawmakers are wasting their time in a special session on a risky measure that isn’t worth considering.
_____
©2026 Miami Herald. Visit at miamiherald.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.






















































Comments