Donald Trump remade the Republican Party in his own image, and those GOP incumbents who’ve attempted to stand in his way or haven’t been exuberantly supportive enough for his liking nearly always have been dispatched to retirement by MAGA primary voters.

Establishment Democratic Party politicians are getting to know the feeling.

First, a trio of democratic socialist upstarts endorsed by New York’s DSA mayor, Zohran Mamdani — proving himself to have Trump-like influence within his fiefdom — ousted two incumbent Democrats and defeated a third endorsed by the retiring congresswoman, all representing Big Apple districts.

Then last Tuesday, incumbent Democratic Rep. Diana DeGette, seeking her 16th term representing Denver, was thumped in the primary by 29-year-old democratic socialist Melat Kiros.

Kiros won by more than 10 percentage points despite carrying the baggage of past incendiary statements such as seeming to give the United States and its Middle East policies primary responsibility for 9/11 — positions that in the recent past would have relegated her to the fringe, at best. One of the Mamdani-backed victors in New York, 32-year-old Darializa Avila Chevalier, told a group of veteran journalists calling themselves the New York Editorial Board that she believes deportation from the U.S. shouldn’t “happen at all,” that “the view of bordering is a very modern construct, actually,” and that she “would love to explore” allowing noncitizens to vote.

Worse, Chevalier attended a rally in Times Square on Oct. 8, attacking Israel one day after Hamas had butchered 1,200 people including children and babies. At the time, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul called the rally “abhorrent and morally repulsive,” as indeed it was. All of the democratic socialist legislators, including then-Assembly Member Zohran Mamdani, were smart enough to stay away, figuring this was not the moment to cheer Hamas, even for those committed to the Palestinian cause. Not so Chevalier.

Thus the GOP attack ads write themselves.

Demonstrably, a majority of Democratic primary voters in deep-blue parts of urban America are so enraged with the current state of affairs that they’re taking their anger out on people over whom they feel they have some control: establishment Democrats.

Part of what’s at work is a reasonable desire to give a party with more than its share of grizzled congressional veterans a jolt of youthful energy. That much we understand. But the majority of Americans aren’t socialists and don’t wish to be governed by kissing cousins of Karl Marx and Kim Jong Un. After CNN reported on phrases like “seize the means of production” showing up (among many other classics) in Chevalier’s now-deleted Twitter account, she said she had grown and moved on from such youthful absurdities as supporting the government of North Korea.

But we’ve yet to see evidence she has traveled far at all.

To this point, the party’s leadership seems at sea about what to do.

As Trump has done to respected incumbents in his party like Texas Sen. John Cornyn, who was defeated in his May primary runoff, so Mamdani, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders and other socialists are doing to the likes of New York Reps. Dan Goldman and Adriano Espaillat. Mamdani even endorsed Espaillat’s reelection bid before reneging and backing the aforementioned Chevalier.

The stakes in this civil war within the Democratic Party go beyond the future of the party itself, a question we thought apt to explore on the nation’s birthday weekend.

As the country’s two major political parties move further toward their ideological extremes, Americans in the political middle find themselves homeless. Folks on the center-right have been grappling with this phenomenon for a decade, giving rise to so-called “never Trumpers.” Now the center-left looks bound to join them in political no-man’s-land.

Or does it?

So far, the Democratic Socialists of America’s success has been confined in large part to deep-blue city districts. Meanwhile, in suburban areas and in statewide contests establishment Democrats generally are winning against progressive challengers. Chicago saw its own version of this dynamic in March in the hotly contested and crowded race to succeed retiring Rep. Jan Schakowsky in the 9th Congressional District. The bomb-throwing influencer Kat Abughazaleh, 27, won the portions of that district in Chicago’s North Side lakefront neighborhoods, but suburban votes gave savvy Evanston Mayor Daniel Biss the win.

What is clear is that centrist Democrats haven’t mounted much of a fight. The DSA candidates and those in their ideological camp have an identity — and an energy — none can mistake. They stand for “Medicare for All,” taxing the rich, yanking all military aid to Israel, abolishing Immigration and Customs Enforcement and rebranding capitalism as a dirty word.

The problem for Democrats is that while those are winning positions in blue cities, they won’t play in many battleground states let alone places like Iowa and Ohio where Democrats will need to compete if they ever want to hold the White House again following reapportionment next decade. The irony for DSAers is that while they’re successfully tapping the intense anger at Trump within their own party, their victims are fellow Democrats.

Sanders, who has been nothing if not consistent over his decades of public service, said on X that he believes these recent DSA victories suggest the country is “on the brink of the political revolution we have been fighting for.”

Good luck with that message in flyover country when the revolutionaries don’t enjoy the advantages of light-turnout primaries.

While unhappiness with Trump’s second term may well yield short-term gains such as recapturing (for now) the House of Representatives, the leftward lurch will make it far harder to defeat Trumpism in the intermediate and long term.

It’s not a mystery why Gallup last year found that 45% of Americans call themselves independents, the highest share the polling outfit ever has recorded. A meaningful and growing chunk of the American electorate is moving toward becoming political free agents, all while the two major parties solidify their shrinking bases through no-holds-barred gerrymandering.

We believe the Americans in the middle who determine the outcome of national elections crave stability and commonsense, nonideological problem-solving. There is a wide open space for Democrats to occupy that territory. Throwing in with the likes of Kiros and Chevalier will only render more Americans without a political home.

Take, as just one example, liberal Jewish voters. How many of them will be willing to swallow sufficiently hard to vote for someone who was justifying the butchery of Hamas on Oct. 8, 2023? Not so many, we’d wager. Rightly so.

Find your voice, centrist Democrats and fast. The socialist brigade is already on the march.

___

©2026 Chicago Tribune. Visit at chicagotribune.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.