Editorial: Data center shows downside to federal land ownership

Las Vegas Review-Journal, Las Vegas Review-Journal on Jul 28, 2026

Published in Op Eds

By clicking submit, I authorize Arcamax and its affiliates to: (1) use, sell, and share my information for marketing purposes, including cross-context behavioral advertising, as described in our Privacy Policy , (2) add to information that I provide with other information like interests inferred from web page views, or data lawfully obtained from data brokers, such as past purchase or location data, or publicly available data, (3) contact me or enable others to contact me by email or other means with offers for different types of goods and services, and (4) retain my information while I am engaging with marketing messages that I receive and for a reasonable amount of time thereafter. I understand I can opt out at any time through an email that I receive, or by clicking here

If Nevada controlled more of the land within its own boundaries, state and local officials would have more input over how that land was used.

The Bureau of Land Management recently announced that it had approved the Townsite Data Center project near Boulder City. The news came as a surprise to Boulder City residents. Many had been fighting efforts to allow a data center on city-owned land.

Data centers are warehouses that house the computer servers used for things such as artificial intelligence and cloud storage. Switch is probably the best-known data center company in Southern Nevada. It has buildings near Interstate 215 and Decatur. Switch has operated for years without much public consternation, but data centers have recently generated fierce opposition throughout the United States. A July poll from Public First found 41 percent of Americans would oppose a data center being built within three miles of their home. Just 24 percent would approve.

Much of this reflects fears about the disruptive effects of AI on employment. Somehow tech executives working with artificial intelligence didn’t foresee the obvious outcome of promising their technological breakthrough would produce mass layoffs.

There are real debates to be had on this issue. Boulder City residents expressed concerns about pollution and other unknowns. Data centers demand an enormous amount of power. Nevada ratepayers must be protected from increased costs. Perhaps data centers could actually help defray some of the costs from Nevada’s foolhardy 50 percent by 2030 renewable portfolio standard. The Southern Nevada Water Authority’s prohibition on evaporative cooling does help alleviate concerns about excessive water use.

On the other hand, Boulder City would have received $2.3 million in taxes and lease payments from a data center built on city land. That money could have funded new services for residents or lowered taxes.

Those are real trade-offs, and it would have been positive for local elected officials to discuss them with potential businesses and local residents. But you lose your leverage when companies can obtain the land they seek from Uncle Sam, as happened here. The feds gave the green light to the project through an unusual process intended to cut red tape during environmental reviews.

In Nevada, the federal government owns more than 80 percent of the state. In Clark County, the federal government controls a staggering 88 percent of the land. While Boulder City would have received millions from a signed lease and property taxes, Clark County receives only peanuts from the federal government. Instead of paying property taxes, the feds sent Clark County just $4.6 million last year for the millions of acres it controls. This rip-off is called “payment in lieu of taxes.”

Perhaps the example of the Boulder City data center on federal land will help convince Nevada Democrats that the state needs to control more of the property within its borders, particularly in developed areas such as Clark County.