Politics

/

ArcaMax

Editorial: Why we support Trump's proposal for peace in Gaza between Israel and Hamas

Chicago Tribune Editorial Board, Chicago Tribune on

Published in Op Eds

To no one’s surprise, Hamas signaled this week that it planned to reject President Donald Trump’s proposal for the future of the Gaza Strip, as did the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), which took part in the Oct. 7 attack against Israel and, the BBC reported, has held some Israeli hostages. A spokesman for Hamas, designated a terrorist organization by the U.S. government even long before Trump came into the picture, told the BBC that the plan “ignores interests of Palestinian people.”

More accurately, it ignores the interests of Hamas, which the plan requires to disarm and effectively disappear. As it should. Otherwise Hamas will be ignoring the interests of the Palestinian people.

For it is impossible to see how the people would be better served by any other eventuality; certainly, not by the U.S. and fellow Arab nations effectively gifting Israel its head and telling them to go ahead and finish their brutal military campaign.

The Trump plan has a lot going for it, and we think it is important for our readers to understand at the outset that it is different from Trump’s prior musings about U.S. control of Gaza or fanciful talk of Trump-branded resorts. This plan is substantive.

Even those who despise Trump in general and are protesting his broader immigration policies should consider this plan, clearly the work of Trump’s capable special envoy Steve Witkoff, on its own terms.

Not every crucial message has an ideal messenger.

Now to the 20-point plan, which clearly states that Gaza is to be redeveloped for the benefit of its people “who have suffered more than enough,” which is the right core goal, the right description of Gaza’s suffering— and maybe even a portal for Hamas to claim victory. The plan also says that, on acceptance by Hamas, the war will immediately end.

As it should. There is no viable argument otherwise.

We’ve said many times before, and we will say here again, that the hostages have to be returned home, whether alive or dead, before anything constructive can happen in Gaza.

We met recently with the new Israeli Consul to the Midwest, Elad Strohmayer, and he emphasized this point. We already understood. We watched videos of the Oct. 7 attacks. We met the families of the hostages. Israel cannot be expected to bend on this issue.

In this plan, though, Israel will “release 250 life sentence prisoners plus 1,700 Gazans who were detained after Oct. 7, 2023, including all women and children detained in that context.” That’s no small concession and, as Strohmayer noted, likely will be painful for many Israelis who have lost loved ones. “For every Israeli hostage whose remains are released,” the plan continues, “Israel will release the remains of 15 deceased Gazans.” The arrival of those remains, great in number, will be painful for the people of Gaza, even if desired.

Moreover, “once all hostages are returned, Hamas members who commit to peaceful co-existence and to decommission their weapons will be given amnesty. Members of Hamas who wish to leave Gaza will be provided safe passage to receiving countries.”

 

That gives Hamas militants their exit. This will be painful for many Israelis too.

After detailing the arrival of humanitarian aid, sorely needed, the plan then goes on to say that “Gaza will be governed under the temporary transitional governance of a technocratic, apolitical Palestinian committee, responsible for delivering the day-to-day running of public services and municipalities for the people in Gaza.” It mentions former British Prime Minister Tony Blair as a likely manager. A reasonable choice. Economic development (yes, involving Trump’s interests, alas, given that Witkoff knows the egotist for whom he works) will follow in what will become a demilitarized Gaza, newly committed to peaceful co-existence with Israel.

Crucially, the United States then will work with Arab and international partners to develop a temporary International Stabilization Force (ISF) to immediately deploy in Gaza. Meanwhile, the Palestinian Authority, which Palestinians have told us face to face that they consider too subject to corruption, will undergo structural reforms.

The involvement of countries such as Egypt (which has a border with Gaza), Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the U.A.E. is crucial to the end of the war and the future of Gaza. The plan emphasizes that Israel “will not occupy Gaza,” beyond a presence in a security buffer zone, which history has taught the country it needs.

Then comes the biggest reason of all Hamas should get out of the way: “While Gaza redevelopment advances and when the (Palestinian Authority) reform program is faithfully carried out, the conditions may finally be in place for a credible pathway to Palestinian self-determination and statehood, which we recognize as the aspiration of the Palestinian people.”

Aspiration is not reality — but it is a start. Especially given current circumstances. This aspiration can become reality, but only if the fighting stops.

Strohmayer discussed with us, roughly in accordance with this plan, the importance of what the Israelis see as a process of “deradicalization,” meaning (as he saw it) a genuine effort not to teach kids that Israel is an evil empire with no right to exist, as now is the case, and promote instead a peaceful co-existence with fellow human beings.

This, too, is aspirational. Changing hearts and minds like that will take a long time, given that the very children in question may well have just seen their loved ones bombed into oblivion. This also flies in the face of the ideology we’ve seen on American campuses and held by many on the American left, who are determined to stick to the idea that Israel is an illegitimate colonial occupier of another’s land, however imperfect the analogy. For its part, some in Israel also will have to deradicalize and Israel will have to make its own concessions.

But the world only spins forward, and history teaches us that a plan like this is the only way to end a war.

This is a very good plan and has our endorsement. It’s also the only one on the table.

_____


©2025 Chicago Tribune. Visit at chicagotribune.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

 

Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Related Channels

The ACLU

ACLU

By The ACLU
Amy Goodman

Amy Goodman

By Amy Goodman
Armstrong Williams

Armstrong Williams

By Armstrong Williams
Austin Bay

Austin Bay

By Austin Bay
Ben Shapiro

Ben Shapiro

By Ben Shapiro
Betsy McCaughey

Betsy McCaughey

By Betsy McCaughey
Bill Press

Bill Press

By Bill Press
Bonnie Jean Feldkamp

Bonnie Jean Feldkamp

By Bonnie Jean Feldkamp
Cal Thomas

Cal Thomas

By Cal Thomas
Christine Flowers

Christine Flowers

By Christine Flowers
Clarence Page

Clarence Page

By Clarence Page
Danny Tyree

Danny Tyree

By Danny Tyree
David Harsanyi

David Harsanyi

By David Harsanyi
Debra Saunders

Debra Saunders

By Debra Saunders
Dennis Prager

Dennis Prager

By Dennis Prager
Dick Polman

Dick Polman

By Dick Polman
Erick Erickson

Erick Erickson

By Erick Erickson
Froma Harrop

Froma Harrop

By Froma Harrop
Jacob Sullum

Jacob Sullum

By Jacob Sullum
Jamie Stiehm

Jamie Stiehm

By Jamie Stiehm
Jeff Robbins

Jeff Robbins

By Jeff Robbins
Jessica Johnson

Jessica Johnson

By Jessica Johnson
Jim Hightower

Jim Hightower

By Jim Hightower
Joe Conason

Joe Conason

By Joe Conason
Joe Guzzardi

Joe Guzzardi

By Joe Guzzardi
John Stossel

John Stossel

By John Stossel
Josh Hammer

Josh Hammer

By Josh Hammer
Judge Andrew P. Napolitano

Judge Andrew Napolitano

By Judge Andrew P. Napolitano
Laura Hollis

Laura Hollis

By Laura Hollis
Marc Munroe Dion

Marc Munroe Dion

By Marc Munroe Dion
Michael Barone

Michael Barone

By Michael Barone
Mona Charen

Mona Charen

By Mona Charen
Rachel Marsden

Rachel Marsden

By Rachel Marsden
Rich Lowry

Rich Lowry

By Rich Lowry
Robert B. Reich

Robert B. Reich

By Robert B. Reich
Ruben Navarrett Jr.

Ruben Navarrett Jr

By Ruben Navarrett Jr.
Ruth Marcus

Ruth Marcus

By Ruth Marcus
S.E. Cupp

S.E. Cupp

By S.E. Cupp
Salena Zito

Salena Zito

By Salena Zito
Star Parker

Star Parker

By Star Parker
Stephen Moore

Stephen Moore

By Stephen Moore
Susan Estrich

Susan Estrich

By Susan Estrich
Ted Rall

Ted Rall

By Ted Rall
Terence P. Jeffrey

Terence P. Jeffrey

By Terence P. Jeffrey
Tim Graham

Tim Graham

By Tim Graham
Tom Purcell

Tom Purcell

By Tom Purcell
Veronique de Rugy

Veronique de Rugy

By Veronique de Rugy
Victor Joecks

Victor Joecks

By Victor Joecks
Wayne Allyn Root

Wayne Allyn Root

By Wayne Allyn Root

Comics

Andy Marlette Dave Whamond Gary Varvel Bob Englehart Joey Weatherford Joel Pett