“Seven times.”

In an annoyingly repetitive TV ad, that’s how often congressional candidate Scott Singer claims he cut taxes as Boca Raton mayor.

A frame from a Scott Singer for Congress TV ad (YouTube.com) It seems as if the ad runs seven times an hour during Miami’s early-morning news.

South Florida viewers endure an endless barrage of ads in two of the nation’s most expensive campaigns for Congress — in Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach counties.

Ten billion dollars and counting is the latest estimate for what has already been spent on political ads that you can’t avoid unless you unplug your TV. It’s projected to reach $11.6 billion by Nov. 3, and that would be the most spent in any election (the 2024 presidential cycle topped out at $11.2 billion).

Such a colossal waste

Imagine the good all that money could accomplish if it were spent instead on housing, healthcare or education. But there are more urgent questions:

— Where’s all that money coming from?

— What do donors expect for their money?

— What about real issues like the future of Social Security?

In one half hour Monday morning, South Florida viewers saw a flurry of ads, back to back to back, targeting Singer and his opponent Jared Moskowitz in District 25 and Casey Askar and rival Pia Dandiya in District 22.

It’s the fight for control of Congress, in 30-second blasts. The commercials fly by so fast, with tiny disclaimers flashed at the very end, that it’s impossible to see who’s paying for what.

Most of the spending is negative not only because it works, but because loopholes in the election law encourage it. Ads paid by big-money political committees are not allowed to say “vote for” or “vote against,” so their best bang for the buck is to sling mud.

Billionaires buying elections

As to what donors expect, Elon Musk is the prime and most shocking example.

The largest known spender so far, he has given more than $276 million since July to Republican groups to save President Trump from facing a Democratic Congress and to protect the lucrative federal contracts of his Texas-based SpaceX company. Of the total, $158 million has gone to a super PAC supporting Texas’ corrupt attorney general, Ken Paxton, in his Senate race against Democrat James Talarico.

Republicans have let their imagination and propaganda run wild about illegal voting by immigrants. But they have nothing to say about the corrupting influence of the money behind a legal immigrant named Musk. That’s a dangerous reality. Musk can cast only a single vote. Why should he be allowed to influence millions of others’ votes so lavishly?

“The American people believe in democracy — one person, one vote, not billionaires buying elections,” Sen. Bernie Sanders told a fired-up crowd of Democrats at a rally Sunday for Senate candidate Angie Nixon at the University of Florida in Gainesville.

Sanders has filed a constitutional amendment to overturn the Supreme Court’s disastrous 2010 Citizens United ruling that unleashed PACs on American democracy. It would also supersede a line of decisions dating to 1976 that made the sky the limit in campaign spending.

As hard as it is pass a constitutional amendment, the need for this one has become dire. Florida is an obvious example why.

Bankrolled by for-profit prisons

In Florida, Byron Donalds topped $131 million in spending last week between his official campaign for governor and his much larger PAC, with a total of $38.1 million remaining.

A notable large new contribution to Friends of Byron Donalds is from the GEO Group, the massive private prison company headquartered in Boca Raton that has flourished under President Trump and Gov. Ron DeSantis.

It gave another $1 million on Oct. 8 for a new total of $3.5 million. That’s the definition of pay-to-play politics.

Democrat David Jolly has taken in some $21 million from all sources and has $4.8 million left.

His major notable new contribution: $1 million from Henry Laufer of Manalapan, a retired Fort Lauderdale hedge fund billionaire and a major donor to other Democratic candidates, including former President Joe Biden. Jolly’s contributors are mostly individuals, although his PAC received $250,000 last week from the NEA Fund for Children and Public Education.

In colonial days, candidates wooed voters with whiskey at the polls and paid for it themselves. We won’t ever go back to those simple days, but today’s stupendously costly electioneering is truly an existential danger to our democracy.

_____

©2026 South Florida Sun Sentinel. Visit at sun-sentinel.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.