Politics

/

ArcaMax

Catherine Thorbecke: You don't have to trust Chinese AI

Catherine Thorbecke, Bloomberg Opinion on

Published in Op Eds

When DeepSeek’s reasoning model burst onto the scene last year and put Chinese artificial intelligence on the global map, the internet responded by probing its views on Taiwan or Tiananmen Square.

Unsurprisingly, the AI tool demurred or straight-up lied. But the gotcha moment obscured an important question. Would it matter to businesses deciding whether to use Chinese AI?

Most companies aren’t turning to these systems because they need a reliable history of Chinese Communist Party flashpoints. With open-weight models, Silicon Valley quickly discovered that political biases could be reduced through post-training and fine-tuning.

Yet the suspicion persists. As Chinese companies expand overseas, their origins — sometimes fairly, sometimes not — tend to taint their trustworthiness scores. I’m often asked if these models are covert propaganda engines or data-harvesting Trojan horses for Beijing.

Open models, however, can offer an alternative to blind faith: scrutiny. Companies can inspect, tinker and even run them inside their own infrastructure. Businesses are already signaling trust by voting with their dollars. And even government-backed researchers from Singapore to Saudi Arabia are building on Chinese AI offerings.

The Swedish Defense Research Agency earlier this year examined whether DeepSeek could be trusted in public administration. It found no technical backdoors or misleading functions beyond the “boilerplate responses” on Chinese foreign policy or Communist Party topics. The conclusion was that DeepSeek models could be used in government settings if they underwent local security analysis and were modified for the intended domain. The agency, however, did not recommend using the Hangzhou-based company’s public web service or mobile application for government work.

In other words, using DeepSeek isn’t the same as handing your data to Beijing. Run the model on your own domestic servers or hardware, whether in Stockholm or Virginia, and the information can stay within your own network. But if your employee is secretly using the consumer app, that’s a different story.

Cognition AI Inc. offers a useful test case. The coding startup, set to reach a $47 billion valuation in its latest funding round, developed one of its marquee models, SWE-1.7, on Kimi K2.7, an open-weight base model from Beijing-based Moonshot.

The San Francisco-based company sells autonomous coding tools to major financial institutions and government agencies, making trust a business imperative. So it devised a two-part evaluation covering propaganda and censorship, as well as security and vulnerabilities. After independent post-training, Cognition found that its model performed in-line with leading U.S. offerings on those tests.

The underlying concerns are real. Researchers at CrowdStrike last year found that DeepSeek’s R1 model produced code with security vulnerabilities when given prompts that the Communist Party considers politically sensitive, such as mentions of Falun Gong and Tibet. However, when Cognition tried to reproduce that behavior on newer models and its customized tool built on the Chinese AI system, they found no statistically meaningful difference when trigger words were used to try and bait different behavior.

Does this mean Chinese AI is inherently trustworthy? Of course not. But it shows national origin is a poor proxy for reliability. What matters more is whether a model can be independently scrutinized. A better framework allows for checks. You don’t have to trust any company if you can independently verify it for yourself.

American developers using Chinese AI models tend to make the same point. Many I’ve spoken to say that they are more comfortable with an open model from China precisely because it gives them better control. There is less need to take a company’s word for it. They can download, test, modify and fine-tune the model, then run it in a closed environment where sensitive data never leaves their systems.

 

The alternative is institutional trust; asking enterprises to put full faith in closed American AI companies to do the right thing with their data (versus use it to train competitors), keep systems secure, and ensure the outputs stay within acceptable ideological bounds.

Chinese AI firms, so far, are offering the opposite pitch: You don’t have to trust us. But you can download our model weights, put them inside your network and inspect them yourself. Whether Beijing will keep supporting this if it threatens its control over information remains to be seen.

For now, this framework may prove more durable. A Nature study found that large language models tend to reflect the ideology of their creators, whether they’re made in Mountain View or Shenzhen. Regulators should focus less on enforcing some supposedly neutral worldview and more on disclosure and transparency.

The irony is that trust is increasingly becoming an American AI problem as well. And that potentially could be a bigger obstacle to adopting the technology than it is in China. Some 87% of respondents in China said they trusted AI, versus only 32% in the U.S., according to an Edelman survey published last October. The same survey found that distrust was a greater barrier to using AI than motivation, access or confidence.

As journalists, we have an old adage: If your mother says she loves you, get a second source. AI makers and regulators should apply the same principle. Trust in a technology this consequential should depend on systems that can be inspected, tested and contained, giving users evidence instead of assurances. The best governance framework doesn’t ask us to put our faith in a single company or country. It makes faith unnecessary.

If Anthropic PBC or DeepSeek says you can trust us, demand proof.

_____

This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.

Catherine Thorbecke is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia tech. Previously she was a tech reporter at CNN and ABC News.

_____


©2026 Bloomberg L.P. Visit bloomberg.com/opinion. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

 

Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Related Channels

The ACLU

ACLU

By The ACLU
Amy Goodman

Amy Goodman

By Amy Goodman
Armstrong Williams

Armstrong Williams

By Armstrong Williams
Austin Bay

Austin Bay

By Austin Bay
Betsy McCaughey

Betsy McCaughey

By Betsy McCaughey
Bill Press

Bill Press

By Bill Press
Bonnie Jean Feldkamp

Bonnie Jean Feldkamp

By Bonnie Jean Feldkamp
Cal Thomas

Cal Thomas

By Cal Thomas
Clarence Page

Clarence Page

By Clarence Page
Danny Tyree

Danny Tyree

By Danny Tyree
David Harsanyi

David Harsanyi

By David Harsanyi
Dick Polman

Dick Polman

By Dick Polman
Erick Erickson

Erick Erickson

By Erick Erickson
Froma Harrop

Froma Harrop

By Froma Harrop
Jacob Sullum

Jacob Sullum

By Jacob Sullum
Jamie Stiehm

Jamie Stiehm

By Jamie Stiehm
Jeff Robbins

Jeff Robbins

By Jeff Robbins
Jessica Johnson

Jessica Johnson

By Jessica Johnson
Jim Hightower

Jim Hightower

By Jim Hightower
Joe Conason

Joe Conason

By Joe Conason
John Stossel

John Stossel

By John Stossel
Josh Hammer

Josh Hammer

By Josh Hammer
Judge Andrew P. Napolitano

Judge Andrew Napolitano

By Judge Andrew P. Napolitano
Laura Hollis

Laura Hollis

By Laura Hollis
Marc Munroe Dion

Marc Munroe Dion

By Marc Munroe Dion
Michael Barone

Michael Barone

By Michael Barone
Mona Charen

Mona Charen

By Mona Charen
Rachel Marsden

Rachel Marsden

By Rachel Marsden
Rich Lowry

Rich Lowry

By Rich Lowry
Robert B. Reich

Robert B. Reich

By Robert B. Reich
Ruben Navarrett Jr.

Ruben Navarrett Jr

By Ruben Navarrett Jr.
Ruth Marcus

Ruth Marcus

By Ruth Marcus
S.E. Cupp

S.E. Cupp

By S.E. Cupp
Salena Zito

Salena Zito

By Salena Zito
Star Parker

Star Parker

By Star Parker
Stephen Moore

Stephen Moore

By Stephen Moore
Susan Estrich

Susan Estrich

By Susan Estrich
Ted Rall

Ted Rall

By Ted Rall
Terence P. Jeffrey

Terence P. Jeffrey

By Terence P. Jeffrey
Tim Graham

Tim Graham

By Tim Graham
Tom Purcell

Tom Purcell

By Tom Purcell
Veronique de Rugy

Veronique de Rugy

By Veronique de Rugy
Victor Joecks

Victor Joecks

By Victor Joecks
Wayne Allyn Root

Wayne Allyn Root

By Wayne Allyn Root

Comics

Al Goodwyn Adam Zyglis Gary McCoy Clay Bennett Tim Campbell Dick Wright