From the Right

/

Politics

SAVE America Act v. Packing Supreme Court: Devil in the Details

Star Parker on

In February 2026, the U.S. House passed the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility America Act to require proof of U.S. citizenship when registering to vote in federal elections and an approved form of government photo ID to cast a ballot.

Every House Republican voted for the SAVE America Act, but every Democrat except one voted against this election integrity measure.

When the Senate sought to consider the House-passed bill in March 2026, every Republican supported the proposal, and every Democrat opposed it. The unanimous opposition of Democrats prevented the Senate from attaining the 60 votes needed under Senate rules and the bill failed to proceed.

President Donald Trump and many conservative activists have urged Senate Republicans to invoke a procedural "nuclear option" to change the Senate rules so that the SAVE America Act and all legislation can proceed with a simple majority.

Many Senate Republicans, including several of its most conservative members, oppose lowering the 60-vote threshold. They believe it will damage the institution's deliberative nature and make it harder to block extreme Democratic legislation when there is a Democratic president with House and Senate majorities.

While many conservatives have vented their frustration against Senate Republicans, Democrats see another villain thwarting their efforts to implement an increasingly liberal agenda: the Republican-appointed majority on the U.S. Supreme Court.

On Sept. 2, 2026, the House voted on a proposed constitutional amendment to keep nine justices on the U.S. Supreme Court -- the number for the past 157 years. The "Keep 9" proposal comes as House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., is saying "everything is on the table" to deal with a Supreme Court majority that Democrats find objectionable.

Former House Majority Whip James Clyburn, D-S.C, called for adding four justices to the Supreme Court in a recent "Meet the Press" interview. Former Vice President Kamala Harris and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., have called for adding at least four new seats to the Court. California Gov. Gavin Newson is "warming to the idea."

The views on court-packing expressed by these current Democratic leaders stand in stark contrast to those of Clinton-appointed Former Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who opposed court-packing.

In 1983, then-Sen. Joe Biden called President Franklin D. Roosevelt's 1937 attempt at court-packing a "bonehead idea" and a "terrible, terrible mistake." During a presidential primary debate in 2019, Biden said adding more justices to the Supreme Court would destroy "any credibility the Court has at all."

 

Conservative opponents of the Democrats' court-packing scheme argue that Democrats and their liberal activists want a Supreme Court that will view the Constitution as a "living, breathing document" that can be interpreted to impose a far-left agenda on America.

The next time there is a Democratic president and Democratic majorities in Congress, many conservatives believe they will eliminate the Senate's 60-vote requirement to enact a wish list of liberal legislation. This list will include a national election law that overrides every photo ID, citizenship verification or clean voter rolls requirement that Republicans have been able to pass at the state or federal level.

The House vote on the "Keep 9" amendment fell short of the two-thirds needed to advance a constitutional amendment. Consistent with their votes against the SAVE America Act, only one Democrat voted to "Keep 9" while 205 voted against it.

The independence of the Supreme Court must be preserved from a future Congress and president manipulating its size for political gain. And size does matters: the smaller the size, the less opportunity for stalemates or legislating from the bench.

Republicans and their conservative allies should recognize who their real opponents are and turn their attention to an election that is less than two months away.

And voters should know these details behind the debate to discern differences between the SAVE America Act and packing the Supreme Court before they decide which party should control our Congress come November.

Star Parker is founder of the Center for Urban Renewal and Education and author of "Necessary Noise, How Donald Trump Inflames the Culture War and Why this is Good News for America" (Hachette 2019). To find out more about Star Parker and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

----


Copyright 2026 Creators Syndicate, Inc.

 

Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Related Channels

Armstrong Williams

Armstrong Williams

By Armstrong Williams
Austin Bay

Austin Bay

By Austin Bay
Betsy McCaughey

Betsy McCaughey

By Betsy McCaughey
Cal Thomas

Cal Thomas

By Cal Thomas
David Harsanyi

David Harsanyi

By David Harsanyi
Erick Erickson

Erick Erickson

By Erick Erickson
John Stossel

John Stossel

By John Stossel
Josh Hammer

Josh Hammer

By Josh Hammer
Judge Andrew P. Napolitano

Judge Andrew Napolitano

By Judge Andrew P. Napolitano
Laura Hollis

Laura Hollis

By Laura Hollis
Michael Barone

Michael Barone

By Michael Barone
Rachel Marsden

Rachel Marsden

By Rachel Marsden
Rich Lowry

Rich Lowry

By Rich Lowry
S.E. Cupp

S.E. Cupp

By S.E. Cupp
Salena Zito

Salena Zito

By Salena Zito
Stephen Moore

Stephen Moore

By Stephen Moore
Terence P. Jeffrey

Terence P. Jeffrey

By Terence P. Jeffrey
Tim Graham

Tim Graham

By Tim Graham
Veronique de Rugy

Veronique de Rugy

By Veronique de Rugy
Victor Joecks

Victor Joecks

By Victor Joecks
Wayne Allyn Root

Wayne Allyn Root

By Wayne Allyn Root

Comics

Mike Smith Phil Hands Andy Marlette John Branch Michael de Adder Steve Sack