From the Left



Humanity: Evolving In Spite Of Itself

Bill Press, Tribune Content Agency on

Editor's note: While Mr. Press is away, Robert Koehler is filling in.

As wars rage, as cruelty shatters lives across the planet -- as nuclear Armageddon remains a viable option for all of us -- I think it's time to claim some stunning awareness in this regard.

The human race is evolving in spite of itself -- evolving beyond war, beyond empire, beyond dominance and conquest, and toward an uncertain but collective future. Indeed, I think most of us already know this, but only at a level so deep, so vague it feels like nothing more than "hope."

There's also another problem. Much of our world remains organized in a totally opposite away: committed, as Richard Falk puts it in his 2013 book, "(Re)Imagining Humane Global Governance," to national policies "shaped by unimaginative thinking trapped within a militarist box." Another way to put this would be: a de facto commitment to human suicide.

As long as there's no serious, organized alternative to war, this is what we're going to get, which, in the wake of Russia's invasion of Ukraine, seems suddenly clearer than it's been since, oh, 1962 (remember the Cuban Missile Crisis?). As long as global order, global security, is allegedly maintained with bombs and bullets and bully-swagger -- and various nuclear-armed enemies occasionally challenge one another for the right to control particular swaths of the planet -- we're hostage to an insanity we seem to have bequeathed ourselves.

What is power? This strikes me as the key question, and untangling ourselves from the wrong answer is the beginning of the creation of real peace.


When we think of power, the word itself commands that we carve the concept into something isolated and wieldable: a sword, a gun, a scepter. Power means power over. There is no basic concept of power -- no word for power in the English language -- that also means collaboration, collective participation: people working together, individually empowered at the same time that they are part of a larger whole.

Even when we examine the dark side of power -- as in, power corrupts -- the examination seems to hover as a warning rather than open up to larger awareness. Consider, for instance, this 2017 article in The Atlantic by Jerry Useem, titled (fasten your seatbelts!) "Power Causes Brain Damage," which discusses a concept it called "hubris syndrome."

The article's essential point is that people who gain a significant amount of power over others lose the ability to empathize with -- or mime, as the article puts it -- people in general, the lesser mortals who must follow the boss's orders. This inability, it turns out, is serious. It isolates the powerful into their own stereotypes and egotistical certainties, which lessens their ability to make good, or even rational, decisions.

The idea is that we're naturally connected and subconsciously "mimic" others: We laugh when others laugh, tense up when others grow tense. It's not faking an emotion to fit in; it's participating in -- feeling -- the collective emotion that fills the room. "It helps trigger the same feelings those others are experiencing and provides a window into where they are coming from," Useem writes. But: Powerful people "stop simulating the experience of others," leading to what is called an "empathy deficit," which saps the powerful of most, or maybe all, of their social skill, leaving them, even as they generate endless obeisance, socially isolated souls.


swipe to next page


blog comments powered by Disqus


Gary Markstein Bob Englehart Darrin Bell Christopher Weyant Dan Wasserman Andy Marlette