A Lot Of Fancy Words For 'why Are Manners?'
DEAR MISS MANNERS: Do you think it is rude to question one's motives? If so, what's behind that thinking?
In court, this is the jury's business, and considering one's motives has to do with our boundaries -- whether or not we should trust someone, become friends with someone, or go into partnership with them with something very important.
In media, as in science, we discuss perspectives and facts in creating arguments or rationales that often include motives, morals or ethics. Those are important considerations that help us set appropriate boundaries at the individual level to protect ourselves, and in considering the societal changes we want to advocate for.
When we do not understand the motive or purpose of specific acts of etiquette, but follow through with what we perceive as polite for the sake of "that's how it's done," aren't we missing out on opportunities to set appropriate boundaries?
GENTLE READER: Understanding motives is a worthy intellectual exercise. But in most cases, Miss Manners hopes that people would begin by assuming the best. Most reasonable people do not intend harm, rudeness or extreme selfishness.
However, even accidents have their consequences. If someone steps on another's foot, but then immediately screams, "I didn't mean to!" that is not going to lessen the pain of the victim.
So while Miss Manners will agree with you that understanding context is important -- not just for protection, but in promoting a compassionate society -- she will fervently argue that until the gross misuse of it subsides, when it comes to manners at least, actions will be more significant than motives.
DEAR MISS MANNERS: My sister-in-law has again generously invited us to share Thanksgiving with her extended family. She cooks straightforward food. She accepted my offer to bring a veggie menu staple.
Is it OK to bring a fancier version of a traditional food (like potatoes or squash) with a few more flavor notes? Maybe it's best to just boil things and offer them in peace.
In the past, my sister-in-law has made another batch of whatever I promised to bring, "just in case you forgot." Maybe this has nothing to do with the answer, though.
GENTLE READER: What is the question? Is it necessary to dumb down your cooking so as not to upstage your sister-in-law?
You are overthinking this. But the mutually suspicious subtext of this relationship is fascinating. If everyone has agreed that you are bringing a certain dish, you should bring the best version of it -- and your sister-in-law should trust you to do so. But maybe it is your food that she finds to be lacking ... See, now Miss Manners is overthinking.
========
(Please send your questions to Miss Manners at her website, www.missmanners.com; to her email, gentlereader@missmanners.com; or through postal mail to Miss Manners, Andrews McMeel Syndication, 1130 Walnut St., Kansas City, MO 64106.)
Copyright 2026 Judith Martin
COPYRIGHT 2026 JUDITH MARTIN
Comments