Entertainment

/

ArcaMax

Review: Tom Cruise flies high -- again -- in the exhilarating 'Top Gun: Maverick'

Justin Chang, Los Angeles Times on

Published in Entertainment News

"If you think, you're dead." That's one of Tom Cruise's more memorable lines from "Top Gun," a cautionary reminder that when your engine flames out or an enemy pilot locks you in their sights, hesitation means death. Inadvertently, the line also suggests the best way to enjoy Tony Scott's immortal 1986 blockbuster: Best not to think too long or hard about the dumb plot, the threadbare romance, the fetishization of U.S. military might or the de rigueur plausibility issues. The key is to succumb, like Cruise's high-flying Maverick himself, to a world of unchecked instinct and pure sensation, to savor the movie's symphony of screaming jets and booming Giorgio Moroder, not to mention all those lovingly photographed torsos and tighty-whities.

Jets still scream and muscles still gleam in the ridiculous and often ridiculously entertaining "Top Gun: Maverick," though in several respects, the movie evinces — and rewards — an unusual investment of brainpower. I'd go further and say that it offers its own decisive reversal of Maverick's dubious logic: It has plenty on its mind, and it's gloriously alive.

A lot of consideration and calculation have clearly gone into this long-aborning blockbuster sequel, insofar as Cruise (one of the producers) and his collaborators have taken such clear pains to maintain continuity with the events, if not the style, of the first film. That's no small thing, more than 30 years after the fiery young Maverick lost Goose, made peace with Iceman and rode off into the annals of fictional U.S. Navy history. And rather than let bygones be bygones, the director Joseph Kosinski and a trio of screenwriters (Ehren Kruger, Eric Warren Singer and Cruise's favorite auteur-wingman, Christopher McQuarrie) have resurrected those threads of rivalry, tragedy and triumph and spun them into uncharted realms of male-weepie grandiosity.

Some of this continuity is a matter of basic story sense, rooted in a shrewd understanding of franchise mechanics and an equally savvy appeal to '80s nostalgia. But it also has something to do with the 59-year-old Cruise's close stewardship of his own superhuman image, a commitment that speaks to his talent as well as his monomania. And with the arguable exception of "Mission: Impossible's" Ethan Hunt, few Cruise characters have felt as aligned with that monomania as Maverick. From the moment he entered the frame in '86, sporting flippant aviator shades and riding a Kawasaki motorcycle, Pete "Maverick" Mitchell announced himself as a signature Cruise creation — a precision-tooled amalgam of underwear-dancing sex symbol (just three years after "Risky Business") and the envelope-pushing, heights-scaling action star he would become.

These days, the need for speed still persists for both Cruise and Maverick, even if the latter does more flying than running. But for all the barriers he's broken and all the miles he's logged in his career as a Navy test pilot, Maverick occupies a state of self-willed professional stasis. Unwilling to be promoted into desk-job irrelevancy, he is a captain by rank and a rebel by nature. The opening sequence finds him playing Icarus with one of the Navy's shiny new toys, thumbing his nose in the process at the first of the movie's two glowering authoritarians. (They're played by Ed Harris and Jon Hamm.) Old habits die hard, but so do the ghosts of the past, and Maverick, for all his reckless abandon in the cockpit, will soon find himself breaking his own rules by thinking more carefully, and tactically, than he's ever had to do before.

Called back to the elite Navy training school where he flew planes, defied orders and irritated his peers with distinction, Maverick is charged with preparing the program's best and brightest for a stealth attack on a far-flung uranium enrichment plant owned by some conveniently unidentified NATO-threatening entity. As impossible missions go, it makes the Death Star trench attack look like a grocery run — a tough assignment for Maverick's 12 brilliant but still-untested pilots, played by actors including Lewis Pullman, Jay Ellis, Danny Ramirez and a terrific Glen Powell as a smug, know-it-all Iceman type. And then there's the hotheaded Rooster (Miles Teller, sullen as only he can be), whose candidacy is complicated by the fact that his late father was Maverick's wingman and best friend, Goose (the great Anthony Edwards, seen here in brief shards of footage from the first "Top Gun"). Talk about chickens coming home to roost.

 

Rooster's background is a ludicrous contrivance. It's also the perfect setup for the kind of rich, thorny cross-generational soap opera that — as much as its aspect-ratio-fluctuating flight sequences and its climactic surge of Lady Gaga — is this movie's reason for being. Those planes may be powered by fuel, but "Top Gun: Maverick" runs on pure, unfiltered dad energy. Try not to smile whenever Cruise's Maverick flashes a mischievous avuncular grin beneath his helmet and chases his young charges in F/A-18s all over the Mojave Desert, teaching them new moves while wasting no chance to reassert his own superiority. Back on the ground, Maverick and Rooster's surrogate daddy-son tensions flare into the open, exacerbated by guilt, resentment and their recognition of their shared stubbornness.

The drama might have taken on an intriguingly Oedipal edge if the filmmakers had thought to bring back, say, Meg Ryan as Carole, Goose's wife and Rooster's mother. But here, with the exception of Monica Barbaro as one of Maverick's most gifted proteges, women are few and far between, and even the more prominent ones get mostly perfunctory treatment. With no sign of Kelly McGillis as the Navy instructor who once took Maverick's breath away, it falls to another flame, Penny (a lovely, underused Jennifer Connelly), to mix a few drinks, provide a flicker of romantic distraction and snuff out the first film's lingering homoerotic vibes. Not that there are many such whiffs here, and more's the pity: Kosinski, who previously directed Cruise in the shiny, empty science-fiction drama "Oblivion," is a skilled craftsman with none of Scott's horned-up filmmaking energy. (He does salute the original with an opening blast of "Danger Zone" and a rousing game of football in the surf, though the latter is more team-building than steam-building exercise.)

Scott's admirers may miss that disreputable edge, the unrepentantly vulgar sensibility that made the original "Top Gun" a dreamy, voluptuous hoot. There's some compensation in Kosinski's fight and flight sequences, full of face-melting ascents, whiplash-inducing loop-de-loops and other airborne stunts that prove considerably more transporting and immersive than what the first "Top Gun" was able to accomplish. That's only to be expected, given the more sophisticated hardware involved. Like any proper commercial for the military-industrial complex, "Top Gun: Maverick" teases the latest cutting-edge advances in aeronautics and defense technology, a field that has evolved roughly in step with an ever more digitally subsumed movie industry.

At the same time, thanks to Cruise and Kosinski's unfashionable insistence on practical filmmaking and their refusal to lean too heavily on computer-generated visual effects, their sequel plays like a throwback in more than one sense. But the era that produced the first film has shifted, and "Top Gun: Maverick" is especially poignant in the ways, both subtle and overt, that it acknowledges the passage of time, the fading of youth and the shifting of its own status as a pop cultural phenomenon. The original was a risky, relatively low-budget underdog that somehow became a perfectly imperfect movie for its moment, soaring on the wings of its dreamy eroticism and recruitment-commercial aesthetics, a mega-hit soundtrack and an incandescent star. It ushered in a new era of decadence for its producers, Don Simpson and Jerry Bruckheimer, and for the many gung-ho American blockbusters they would keep cranking out.

...continued

swipe to next page
©2022 Los Angeles Times. Visit latimes.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
 

Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus