Former FBI Director Comey asks judge to dismiss Trump threat case over '86 47' post

Virginia Bridges, The News & Observer (Raleigh) on Jul 27, 2026

By clicking submit, I authorize Arcamax and its affiliates to: (1) use, sell, and share my information for marketing purposes, including cross-context behavioral advertising, as described in our Privacy Policy , (2) add to information that I provide with other information like interests inferred from web page views, or data lawfully obtained from data brokers, such as past purchase or location data, or publicly available data, (3) contact me or enable others to contact me by email or other means with offers for different types of goods and services, and (4) retain my information while I am engaging with marketing messages that I receive and for a reasonable amount of time thereafter. I understand I can opt out at any time through an email that I receive, or by clicking here

Former FBI Director James Comey Jr. is asking a federal judge to dismiss a federal criminal case accusing him of threatening President Donald Trump, arguing that his Instagram post at the center of the case doesn’t meet the legal definition of a “true threat.”

“While the indictment fails on its face to allege a true threat, the background to this prosecution underscores the danger to free speech that it poses,” states a 42-page brief on the motion filed Monday.

The motion and supporting brief mark Comey’s first attempt to dismiss the two federal charges against him.

His attorneys argue the indictment targets speech protected by the First Amendment and “a well-known political slogan that expresses opposition to the President.”

Thousands of items featuring the slogan “86 47” have been sold on the internet, but the government is singling out Comey “to prosecute one of the President’s most prominent critics,” the filing states.

While the government claims that the “86 47” post is a “true threat,” it is contradicted, “by every possible source of meaning: dictionaries, context, precedent, and common sense,” the filing states.

The filing asks U.S. District Judge Louise W. Flanagan to dismiss the indictment in the federal Eastern District of North Carolina, arguing the prosecution violates Comey’s constitutional rights.

About the federal charges against James Comey

The North Carolina case stems from a May 2025 Instagram post in which Comey shared a photo of seashells arranged to read “86 47” that he said he found on a North Carolina beach.

Federal officials immediately began investigating the alleged threat against Trump, the 47th president, according to court documents.

The Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines 86 as ejecting, dismissing or removing a person from a place, or an item from a menu.

But Trump and federal prosecutors say the post amounted to a threat against the president. Comey has said he did not intend the post as a threat and removed it after learning others interpreted it that way.

A North Carolina grand jury indicted Comey on April 28 on two felony charges: threatening the president and transmitting a threat across state lines.

Each charge carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison. The case has drawn national attention as it tests the line between protected political speech and what federal law treats as a true threat.

What is next?

All pretrial motions are due by Tuesday, according to a schedule set by Flanagan. Responses are due by Aug. 18 and then Sept. 1.

Comey’s arraignment, a hearing in which he would plead guilty or not guilty, is set for Sept. 30 at the federal courthouse in New Bern. If the case proceeds to a jury trial, it is scheduled to begin Oct. 21.

_____