Health Advice



Rapid, cheap, home tests for coronavirus are in the works, but accuracy is an issue

Marie McCullough, The Philadelphia Inquirer on

Published in Health & Fitness

Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine tweeted early Thursday that he had tested positive for the coronavirus and would not be greeting President Donald Trump. Hours later, DeWine announced that two different tests had come back negative.

There, in a nutshell, is the nation's next pandemic testing dilemma.

DeWine first had an "antigen" test -- fast and convenient, but not very reliable. Then he had two high-accuracy, lab-based molecular tests -- the kind that have been a technical, logistical, and public health nightmare in the United States. Most molecular test results now are so delayed that they are practically useless in curbing the spread of the virus.

Is it possible to find a risk-benefit balance between accuracy and convenience? Some governors, including DeWine, and prominent scientists believe the answer is yes.

"Simple at-home tests for the coronavirus, some that involve spitting into a small tube of solution, could be the key to expanding testing and impeding the spread of the pandemic," Harvard Medical School epidemiologist and testing expert Michael Mina wrote in a New York Times op-ed. "The Food and Drug Administration should encourage their development and then fast track approval."

When a virus invades the body, it starts producing a signature protein -- an antigen -- to which the immune system responds by making disease-fighting antibodies. Antigen tests work well when lots of antigen is present. But in the early days of an infection, when the viral load is low, an antigen test may be no better than a coin flip.


Molecular tests, in contrast, can detect minute quantities of fragments of viral genetic material in a nasal swab. Yet even this technology misses as many as 30% of infections, studies suggest.

So far, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved two coronavirus antigen tests, one made by Becton Dickinson (BD), the other by Quidel. While the tests can provide results in as little as 15 minutes using a nasal specimen, they are not home tests. These are "point-of-care" tests that have to be done in a clinic, nursing home, or doctor's office that has installed the companies' testing platforms.

Even so, a bipartisan group of seven governors, including DeWine, is banking on point-of-care antigen testing to expand and speed diagnosis. This week, the governors partnered with the Rockefeller Foundation to pursue a deal for 3.5 million antigen tests. Discussions are underway with BD and Quidel.

Meanwhile, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services plans to send antigen tests to nursing homes throughout the country, according to Pennsylvania Secretary of Health Rachel Levine.


swipe to next page



Christopher Weyant Fort Knox Momma Flo & Friends Breaking Cat News Dennis the Menace