Your email address is safe with us. View our Privacy policy.
Author Bio:
Michael Barone has studied at both Harvard and Yale, where he was editor for publications from both colleges. He has also served as an editor for ...
Read more about Michael Barone.
Michael Barone has studied at both Harvard and Yale, where he was editor for publications from both colleges. He has also served as an editor for ...
Read more about Michael Barone.
Virginia, New Jersey Races Showing Voters Changing Course
Michael Barone
As the final votes were being counted, it was possible to draw some
lessons from Republican Bob McDonnell's victory in Virginia and the
close, three-way governor's race in New Jersey, never mind that White
House press secretary Robert Gibbs has taken to saying that the
elections don't mean much.
The odd-year elections -- held in the first year of a presidency -- have been meaningful over the last two decades. In 1993, New Jersey voters rejected tax-raising Democratic Gov. James Florio, despite the best efforts of Bill Clinton's consultant James Carville -- a harbinger of the losses congressional Democrats suffered the next year after they raised taxes and supported, unavailingly, massive health care proposals.
In Virginia that year, Republican George Allen was elected on a platform of abolishing parole and opposing gun control. Those quickly became national consensus policies and remain so today.
In 2001, just weeks after the Sept. 11 attacks, George W. Bush's Republicans suffered defeats in Virginia and New Jersey. In Virginia, Mark Warner showed that a Democrat conversant with country music and stock car racing could make inroads in rural areas that had little use for Bill Clinton or Al Gore. Democrats gained their congressional majorities in 2006 by winning such areas.
In New Jersey, Democrat Jim McGreevey showed the enduring power of the gains that Clinton and Gore had made in suburbs hostile to cultural conservatives. These areas rejected Bush even when he was winning re-election in 2004.
This year the issues in the governor elections in Virginia and New Jersey are reasonably congruent with those raised by the programs of the Obama administration and congressional Democratic leaders. Democratic nominee Creigh Deeds in Virginia and Democratic incumbent Jon Corzine in New Jersey have refused to rule out tax increases even as congressional Democrats press health care bills loaded with them. Their Republican opponents have both opposed tax increases.
In Virginia, McDonnell has done considerably more than that. He has advanced substantive, detailed positions on transportation, jobs and education -- issues that affect voters' everyday lives. He has also weighed in against national Democrats' health care, card check and cap-and-trade bills, while Deeds has dodged them -- a clear sign those stands are unpopular in a state that voted 53 percent for Barack Obama.
Every Virginia poll taken since mid-October showed McDonnell with a double-digit lead, and he and his Republican ticket mates swept to solid victories. Those who dismiss such results as irrelevant to national politics might want to have a chat with Florio.
New Jersey this year is more complicated. About 60 percent of voters disapprove of Corzine's performance in a state with some of the highest taxes and public employee pensions in the country. But Corzine has used his personal wealth to drag Republican Chris Christie's numbers down, and independent candidate Chris Daggett could take enough votes for Corzine to squeak through.
But a Corzine plurality win could scarcely be taken as an endorsement of Democratic policies in a state that Obama carried with 57 percent of the vote.
There will be some lessons in the results for Republicans, as well. One of the big surprises of this year has been the spontaneous outpouring of spirited opposition to the Democrats' big government programs and the disappearance of the enthusiasm that propelled Obama and Democrats to their big wins in 2008. The question is how Republicans can harness that enthusiasm.
McDonnell did that in Virginia with a classic campaign. Early on, he staked out clear and detailed positions on issues important to voters and refused to be distracted by Washington Post news stories designed to depict him as an intolerant troglodyte. He showed the sense of command voters want in an executive.
Christie, with less experience in electoral politics, did not present such a detailed platform, which left him vulnerable to vote-poaching by Daggett and to the cynical attacks of the Corzine campaign. He's vulnerable as well to demographics: As he noted in his last ad, New Jersey's high taxes have been driving conservative voters out of the state.
Yes, both of these governor races involve issues specific to particular states and candidates with particular strengths and weaknesses. But the odd-year elections of 2009, like those of 1993 and 2001, still provide clues to where the nation's voters are headed, and it's a different direction than they took in the presidential election last year.
========
Michael Barone is senior political analyst for The Washington Examiner. To find out more about Michael Barone, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.
Copyright 2009 U.S. News and World Report. Distibuted by Creators Syndicate Inc.
This news arrived on: 11/05/2009
Printer Friendly Version | Send this page to a friend | Post Comment
Rate This Story:
Great - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 - Bad
Posted Comments:
11-07-2009 18:52
John W Smith III wrote:
What i mean't is the lobbyist don't vote in their districts election so they will be own their own for Dems. support.
11-07-2009 18:05
JCE wrote:
John W Smith III A little research shows that for the most part, those who get the most lobby money from the insurance companies are voting against the bill. That, and those who own the most stock, and the most companies who are in the business. Why do you think they give so much money to the congress members, and why do you thing congress refuses reform on lobbyists? Politicians always juggle between doing what the special interests have paid them for, and conning the people into believing that they are doing what they were elected for. But it is the lobby money that they campaign with.
11-07-2009 18:01
JCE wrote:
When one figures out how powerful the media is, how so few people control it, especially right wing conservatives, it is amazing how much truth one can find when one looks. Look at some of the people who control the news:
RUPERT MURDOCH, Owner Fox TV, New York Post, London Times,
News of the World
SANDY KRUSHOW, Chair, Fox Entertainment
PETER CHERNIN, second in-command at Rupert Murdoch's News.
Corp., owner of Fox TV
WILLIAM SAFIRE, syndicated columnist for the NYT.
ARIE FLEISCHER, Dubya's press secretary.
STEPHEN EMERSON, every media outlet's first choice as an
expert on domestic terrorism.
DENNIS LEIBOWITZ, head of Act II Partners, a media hedge fund
KENNETH POLLACK, for CIA analysts, director of Saban Center for Middle East Policy, writes op-eds in NY Times, New Yorker Watch
RICHARD LEIBNER, runs the N.S. Bienstock talent agency, which represents 600 news personalities such as Dan Rather, Dianne Sawyer and Bill O'Reilly.
SANDY GRUSHOW, chair of Fox Entertainment
GAIL BERMAN, president of Fox Entertainment
WOLF BLITZER, host of CNN's Late Edition
ANDREA KOPPEL, CNN Reporter
PAULA ZAHN, CNN Host
WILLIAM KRISTOL, Editor, Weekly Standard, Exec. Director
DENNIS PRAGER, Talk Show Host, nationally syndicated from LA.
And the people listen to what they want them to listen to.
RUPERT MURDOCH, Owner Fox TV, New York Post, London Times,
News of the World
SANDY KRUSHOW, Chair, Fox Entertainment
PETER CHERNIN, second in-command at Rupert Murdoch's News.
Corp., owner of Fox TV
WILLIAM SAFIRE, syndicated columnist for the NYT.
ARIE FLEISCHER, Dubya's press secretary.
STEPHEN EMERSON, every media outlet's first choice as an
expert on domestic terrorism.
DENNIS LEIBOWITZ, head of Act II Partners, a media hedge fund
KENNETH POLLACK, for CIA analysts, director of Saban Center for Middle East Policy, writes op-eds in NY Times, New Yorker Watch
RICHARD LEIBNER, runs the N.S. Bienstock talent agency, which represents 600 news personalities such as Dan Rather, Dianne Sawyer and Bill O'Reilly.
SANDY GRUSHOW, chair of Fox Entertainment
GAIL BERMAN, president of Fox Entertainment
WOLF BLITZER, host of CNN's Late Edition
ANDREA KOPPEL, CNN Reporter
PAULA ZAHN, CNN Host
WILLIAM KRISTOL, Editor, Weekly Standard, Exec. Director
DENNIS PRAGER, Talk Show Host, nationally syndicated from LA.
And the people listen to what they want them to listen to.
11-07-2009 03:03
SKManning wrote:
old cowboy,
I think you're right about the "fullest trough", but I think it's a matter of the right convincing some that an empty trough is full...Delusions of the right. The right depends so much on lies and deceit.
John W. Smith III,
You're right! Lobbyists represent nothing less than legalized bribery!
I recommend to anyone who is interested that you watch the movie "The Distinguished Gentleman" starring Eddie Murphy... It came out back in the 90's. It is an exellent rendering of just how Washington works. The characters are fictional but the representation of Washington politics is factual. Very informative.
casey42,
The Fox News Channel, as I'm sure you know, is the propaganda machine of the racist right, and this plays into what old cowboy and John W. Smith III are saying.
Limbaugh, Hannity and Beck are so persistent in their onslaught of lies that many continue to believe that an empty trough is full, that legalized bribery is OK, and that voting for the rich will help working people.
I think you're right about the "fullest trough", but I think it's a matter of the right convincing some that an empty trough is full...Delusions of the right. The right depends so much on lies and deceit.
John W. Smith III,
You're right! Lobbyists represent nothing less than legalized bribery!
I recommend to anyone who is interested that you watch the movie "The Distinguished Gentleman" starring Eddie Murphy... It came out back in the 90's. It is an exellent rendering of just how Washington works. The characters are fictional but the representation of Washington politics is factual. Very informative.
casey42,
The Fox News Channel, as I'm sure you know, is the propaganda machine of the racist right, and this plays into what old cowboy and John W. Smith III are saying.
Limbaugh, Hannity and Beck are so persistent in their onslaught of lies that many continue to believe that an empty trough is full, that legalized bribery is OK, and that voting for the rich will help working people.
11-06-2009 21:46
old cowboy wrote:
Votes addendum
I should have added that the lobbyists and those they represent have way more money than the individuals who donate and the hogs will always go to the fullest trough.
Comment archive | Comment FAQ's
![]() |
![]() |
View Michael Barone ezine stories by date or visit the complete archive |
Featured Channel: Politics
The ArcaMax Politics channel is one of 70 content categories offered by ArcaMax Publishing on this ... |











Best Freebies