MLB's economic proposal includes sliding scale for salary cuts

Bill Shaikin, Los Angeles Times on

Published in Baseball

After major league players made clear they had no interest in participating in a revenue-sharing plan for an abbreviated 2020 season, owners Tuesday proposed that players instead accept a sliding scale of pay cuts.

While all players would be expected to take less than a prorated salary, the players with the highest salaries would lose the greatest percentage of pay. With players already having agreed they would receive no pay for canceled games, the proposal set up a potential scenario for some of the game's greatest stars to play about 50% of the season for about 25% of their previously guaranteed salaries.

With the window closing on an agreement to play even half a season, the official statements from the two parties did not exude compromise.

From the Major League Baseball Players Association: "The proposal involves massive pay cuts and the union is extremely disappointed. We're also far apart on health and safety protocols."

From MLB: "We made a proposal to the union that is completely consistent with the economic realities facing our sport. We look forward to a responsive proposal from the MLBPA."

Under the proposal, players making minimum salary would play the half-season schedule for about 46% of their 2020 salary, according to details first reported by ESPN. The highest-paid players would play for about 22% of their 2020 salary.


"Interesting strategy of making the best most marketable players potentially look like the bad guys," Milwaukee Brewers pitcher Brett Anderson said on Twitter.

Although the average major league salary is about $4 million, that figure is skewed by the highest salaries. The median salary for players -- half make more, half make less -- is closer to $1.5 million.

On the Los Angeles Angels' projected roster, which could expand to 30 for this shortened season, nine players were set to make more than $4 million this year. Four players -- Mike Trout, Albert Pujols, Anthony Rendon and Justin Upton -- were set to make more than $20 million apiece.

If the MLBPA were to accept this proposal, Trout's salary could fall from about $36 million to about $9 million. However, if the MLBPA were to insist on equal pay cuts irrespective of salary -- better protecting the likes of Trout, Pujols, Rendon and Upton -- a player making the league minimum of $563,500 could lose much more than half that salary, in what might be the only season of his major league career.


swipe to next page