Consumer

/

Home & Leisure

Do tiny homes really work as a solution to homelessness? Here's what the data show

Marisa Kendall, The Mercury News on

Published in Home and Consumer News

When Robert Hernandez unpacked his meager belongings into one of San Jose’s celebrated tiny homes, finally getting a bed and access to a shower after more than a decade on the street, he had reason to be elated.

After all, tiny homes have become the hot new thing in the fight to end homelessness. The simple dwellings have multiplied across the Bay Area in the last few years and have been touted in splashy news conferences by everyone from the region’s big city mayors to Gov. Gavin Newsom as a salve to one of California’s thorniest problems.

But even after 55-year-old Hernandez moved into his tiny home on Mabury Road near Coyote Creek, it turned out he still had a long road ahead. For the more than 2,000 people like Hernandez who have tried out the Bay Area’s tiny home experiment, the single biggest measure of the model’s success is what happens next: Can a temporary stay in a tiny home be a final step on the path to permanent housing?

To explore that question, the Bay Area News Group spent four months following several tiny home residents and analyzed three years of data from Santa Clara and Alameda — the counties with the Bay Area’s largest homeless populations, and the two that have most fully embraced tiny homes — with the goal of determining how well the model works to get people into stable housing. The results could have implications throughout California and beyond as the tiny home movement continues to pick up steam across the West Coast.

Nobody has more riding on the success of tiny homes than people like Hernandez, who was accepted into the program in April after losing his possessions in an RV fire.

But he quickly found himself sitting alone in his new room with nothing to do but read and think, and he couldn’t stop dwelling on the San Jose homeless encampment he’d left behind. His “street family” — including two close friends with schizophrenia — was still there, living on a dusty, vacant lot near Columbus Park, among dozens of tents and RVs. Without him, who would make sure his loved ones ate? Got medical care? Stayed out of fights?

 

So he started going back to visit — and to sleep over. After he’d been away from the tiny home too long, they gave his spot to someone else, telling him they thought he’d abandoned it.

Hernandez’s story is one of many that showcase the countless pitfalls lurking along the path from tiny home to permanent housing. While thousands of hours of effort and millions of dollars have helped establish tiny homes as a promising solution even in some of the hardest cases, a close look suggests they remain a limited option in the face of the region’s overwhelming homelessness crisis — underscoring the immensely difficult nature of the problem.

This news organization’s analysis found:

—Tiny homes don’t work for most participants: People moving out of tiny homes in Alameda County failed to find permanent housing nearly three-quarters of the time between June 2019 and June 2022. In Santa Clara County, people failed to find permanent housing more than half of the time.

...continued

swipe to next page
©#YR@ MediaNews Group, Inc. Visit at mercurynews.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus