Consumer

/

Home & Leisure

If you lost money in crypto, here's how you can get some back

Erin Arvedlund, The Philadelphia Inquirer on

Published in Home and Consumer News

But for now "no such rule applies to crypto, as the IRS classifies crypto as property and not a security," notes EisnerAmper accountant Brian McFarlane in a blog post.

That means "an investor can do what is called 'tax-loss harvesting' — sell their position in cryptocurrencies for a loss, then repurchasing right away," Felten explained.

This current loophole for crypto investors was supposed to end if the Build Back Better Act passed through the U.S. Senate — but the legislation has stalled and the loophole remains.

Boosters fall to Earth

Crypto investor and cheerleader Anthony Scaramucci, who became a household name during his short stint as President Donald Trump's communications director, has been humbled.

The SkyBridge Capital founder acknowledged in a recent CNBC interview that his concentration in crypto was a short-term "mistake." Though he said he still thinks of crypto as a long-term winner: "I want to measure the Bitcoin investment over a four-year interval."

Investors with SkyBridge aren't happy. Scaramucci told DealBook on Wednesday that investors were trying to withdraw up to $890 million from SkyBridge's flagship fund, and Bloomberg reported two days earlier that SkyBridge had suspended investor withdrawals from another one of its funds.

"We had a big position in Bitcoin," Scaramucci told CNBC, explaining that his firm bought Bitcoin when it was worth around $18,000, before its value went up to about $69,000 and then came back down to $22,000. "You take money in at the top ... and money leaves at the bottom, so I wish people would recognize that and stay calm ... if we went from $18,000 to $22,000 everyone would be happy right now, but it didn't go that way."

Regulatory vacuum

 

Who regulates cryptocurrencies in the U.S.? At this point, it's a turf war.

Agencies are still staking out territory over which agency will oversee crypto, and that's left an enforcement vacuum and investors fending for themselves. That's despite large firms such as Fidelity starting to allow investors with 401(k) retirement accounts to buy Bitcoin.

"Anytime there's a crash, like now or the 2008, investors ask, 'Why aren't regulators doing more?'" said Wharton professor Kevin Werbach. He testified before Congress this year on "Demystifying Crypto: Digital Assets and the Role of Government" on the need for smart regulation of this new asset class.

Securities attorney William "Bill" Singer argues that agencies like the Securities and Exchange Commission need to act aggressively — and soon.

"Those victimized will see it as too little, too late," said Singer. "While the SEC has been issuing press releases about new rules and initiatives, a lot of time has been wasted."

At some point, regulators will want to know "whether investors were warned of the very issues that have now arisen and have damaged their investment," said Singer, publisher of the BrokeAndBroker blog. "The very same folks now urging caution and patience sure as hell didn't mention either of those words when pumping the promise of crypto."

The crypto industry "is spending more money lobbying in Washington than the defense industry" to influence which agency will regulate, said Hilary Allen, a law professor at American University. "The turf war is really starting to heat up."

©2022 The Philadelphia Inquirer, LLC. Visit at inquirer.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus