ArcaMax

While the drivetrain (3.5 liter V6/CVT automatic) carry over, more mileage has been extracted from this combo due to several hundred pounds less curb weight - and the EPA rating stays the same (21 city/28 highway) whether you go with the FWD or the AWD version. Usually, you lose at least 1-2 MPGs by opting for AWD, which adds a little weight as well as some additional driveline friction to overcome. That's not the case here.

NIssan's superb "zero gravity" seats are also standard equipment in all Muranos - including base trims - and you get them in both rows.

WHAT'S GOOD

Pretty on the outside. More sensibly laid out inside. Stronger standard engine than in the Ford Edge. Increased gas mileage without decreased performance vs. last year's Murano. "Near luxury" and "luxury" are becoming distinctions without much of a difference.

WHAT'S NOT SO GOOD

Looks sportier - but isn't. Edge's optional engines offer better power/performance (including much higher tow ratings) than Murano's only-available engine. The Ford's still roomier inside, too.

UNDER THE HOOD

One of the few things that's not new about the '15 Murano is its drivetrain, which carries over from last year. All trims get the same 3.5 liter, 260 hp V6 - paired with a continuously variable (CVT) automatic and either FWD or (optionally) AWD.

What has changed is the Murano's EPA gas mileage rating - which climbs to 21 city, 28 highway with either FWD or AWD - vs. the '14 Murano's 18 city, 24 highway with FWD (and 18 city, 23 highway with AWD). That's a 5 MPG again on the highway for the '15 AWD Murano.

But if the engine and transmission are basically the same this year as last year, how come the new Murano's mileage is that much better?

...continued