Ira Winderman: Heat offseason turns into lesson in leverage

Ira Winderman, South Florida Sun-Sentinel on May 17, 2026

By clicking submit, I authorize Arcamax and its affiliates to: (1) use, sell, and share my information for marketing purposes, including cross-context behavioral advertising, as described in our Privacy Policy , (2) add to information that I provide with other information like interests inferred from web page views, or data lawfully obtained from data brokers, such as past purchase or location data, or publicly available data, (3) contact me or enable others to contact me by email or other means with offers for different types of goods and services, and (4) retain my information while I am engaging with marketing messages that I receive and for a reasonable amount of time thereafter. I understand I can opt out at any time through an email that I receive, or by clicking here

MIAMI — In the end, the Miami Heat’s offseason could come down to a lesson in leverage, namely who has it, who controls it, who maximizes it.

This all, of course, in regard to Giannis Antetokounmpo, the factor that seemingly will drive the direction of the Heat offseason until he is or is not driven off the lot in Milwaukee.

While other names will come and go — LeBron James the latest injected into the speculation sphere along with Kevin Durant, Kawhi Leonard and Ja Morant — the Heat cannot put anything/anyone into play until it is known if there can be an Antetokounmpo answer.

Which brings it to leverage.

Antetokounmpo has it because of his 2027-28 player option. If a trade destination is not one of his choice, he can let it be known he merely would be a rental, possibly to hit free agency as soon as 13 months from now.

For their part, the Bucks continue to operate as if they control it, able to sit back and dictate terms of a trade or able to let it play out to a deadline of their choosing.

And when it comes down to who maximizes it, that could be as simple as a suitor, such as the Heat, with an offer that can’t be refused.

To that end, those three elements of leverage would appear reasonably concrete.

They are not.

Because even when games aren’t being played by the Bucks or Heat or anyone else eliminated from the postseason, the playing field continues to evolve.

This past week was a perfect — and meaningful — example.

During an appearance on his Game Recognize Game podcast, Myles Turner said of last season’s first year as Antetokounmpo’s Milwaukee teammate that when it comes to punctuality, “Giannis is going to show up whenever he wants, really. I think that this kind of just came with the territory.”

As in Myles Turner the center the Bucks broke the bank to sign last summer, as in the center whose four-year, $108 million contract forced the Bucks to waive and stretch, at considerable cost, the contract of Damian Lillard (due $22.5 million each of the next four seasons despite being waived).

As in, how exactly is that going to work next season if Turner and Antetokounmpo are back in the same locker room?

So, Bucks’ leverage lost?

For that matter, as he playfully posts on social media as if all is well in his world, the question becomes even with the coaching change from Doc Rivers to Taylor Jenkins, is that where Antetokounmpo would want to commit to the extension that ownership has said would be requirement for the relationship to endure?

So, Antetokounmpo’s leverage about to ensue, at least when it comes to guiding the discussion to destination of choice?

And then there is the part of the leverage exercise that so many times before has proven detrimental to the Heat — the waiting game.

With Shaquille O’Neal, Pat Riley went to Los Angeles for what the Lakers thought would be a job interview and instead planted the seeds for the Shaquille O’Neal trade.

With Jimmy Butler, the seeds were planted by the end of Butler’s lone season with the Philadelphia 76ers. At the start of free agency that deal, even with all its complexities, was done.

But when it came to waiting games with Lillard and Durant, entire Heat offseasons were subverted. For that matter, such also was the case with the weeks-long wait in 2014 free agency with LeBron, leaving the Heat to wonder what to then do with Danny Granger, Josh McRoberts and even Shabazz Napier.

So the Heat offer should be best offer, on the table, take it, leave it, but decision sooner rather than later. Leverage.

Tyler Herro and Kel’el Ware? A logical starting point. This June’s No. 13 pick? Sure, Milwaukee, and who would you like taken at that spot (the Heat have to exercise it by NBA rule)? A couple of prospects, say two from the pool of Jaime Jaquez Jr., Kasparas Jakucionis, Pelle Larsson, Nikola Jovic? And then one more unprotected future first-round pick or perhaps multiples if lottery protections in place?

As in the leverage now … or never.

Each party has a degree of leverage.

For the Bucks, Turner’s comments come off as a dumpster fire that needs to be extinguished as soon as possible, with a seeming advantage for Giannis suitors. A reset feels inevitable in Milwaukee amid new coach and incoming part-owner.

For Antetokounmpo, the opportunity to step forward, list destinations (plural, since Adam Silver made it clear with Lillard that a sole destination would lead to sanction), put the process on his timetable.

For the Heat, the moment at hand of best offer on the table, with chess clock alongside, ticking away.

Leverage, per Merriam-Webster: “Influence or power used to achieve a desired result.”

The time is at hand for all involved.