Politics

/

ArcaMax

Trump's Guantanamo Bay order may be largely symbolic, but it renews debate

Laura King, Tribune Washington Bureau on

Published in Political News

A: Practices have varied over the years, but suspects have very few legal rights, and accounts have frequently surfaced of methods widely seen as torture -- sleep deprivation, denial of food and water, beatings, isolation and exposure to extremes of heat and cold.

Q: Why was Obama unable to make good on his promise to close Guantanamo?

A: It was a long and complicated saga that lasted his entire presidency. Obama largely blamed Congress, but one significant obstacle was foreign governments refusing to accept custody of those the United States wanted to release. The Pentagon also raised roadblocks.

Q: What does Trump's executive order say?

A: The president gave Defense Secretary James N. Mattis 90 days to hold consultations and come up with a new policy for military detentions. "Terrorists are not merely criminals; they are unlawful enemy combatants," Trump declared in his speech. "When they are captured overseas, they should be treated like the terrorists they are."

Q: What has Trump said about Guantanamo in the past?

A: On the campaign trail and as president-elect, he railed against the release and transfer of prisoners from Guantanamo. Most of these -- 532 -- were made under President George W. Bush, and 197 by Obama. Trump has praised the facility as an appropriate destination for "bad dudes," and last year raised the prospect of sending Uzbek national Sayfullo Saipov, the suspect in a truck attack on a Manhattan bike path that killed eight people, to Guantanamo. The idea, which legal experts said would have been highly complicated, was dropped.

Q: What has been the reaction to Trump's announcement?

A: The president's remarks on Guantanamo won warm applause from Republican lawmakers, and his backers see his declaration as keeping with a hard line on terrorism. Critics say it fits with a pattern of animosity toward Muslims and disregard for the rule of law. The group Physicians for Human Rights called the facility a "symbol of U.S. torture and injustice known around the world." Former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton, a Trump supporter, praised the decision on Twitter, saying it reflected the embracing of a "war paradigm" for dealing with terrorism suspects.

--Sponsored Video--

Q: What rationale did Trump offer for keeping prisoners at Guantanamo?

A: Speaking generally about the topic of dangerous figures being released, Trump cited the case of Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, who was not held at Guantanamo. He was held in U.S. custody in Iraq, but was released. Trump's reason for keeping the facility open revolved mainly around notions of well-deserved punishment. "Terrorists who do things like place bombs in civilian hospitals are evil," Trump said in his speech. "When possible, we have no choice but to annihilate them."

Q: Who might end up at Guantanamo now?

A: No new detainees have arrived since Trump took office, nor have any been released. The executive order stipulates that U.S. authorities "may transport additional detainees to U.S. Naval Station Guantanamo Bay when lawful and necessary to protect the Nation." But in recent years, U.S. federal courts have proved a much more fruitful venue for trying terrorism cases, with more than 500 such prosecutions taking place since the Sept. 11 attacks. The military commissions at Guantanamo have convicted eight, and four of those were overturned on appeal.

(c)2018 Los Angeles Times

Visit Los Angeles Times at www.latimes.com

Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

 

Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus