US Supreme Court won't hear Seattle's Union Gospel Mission's anti-LGBTQ+ hiring policies case

Anna Patrick and Sydney Brownstone, The Seattle Times on

Published in Religious News

Denise Diskin, executive director of the QLaw Foundation of Seattle, which has been doing the legal work on the case along with Legal Voice and Seattle Employment Law Partners, said the state Supreme Court ruled that religious employers cannot discriminate unless the employee is a minister. But Diskin said it is unclear whether Woods would have been considered ministerial under that definition.

Those key facts around whether a staff attorney position in a legal aid clinic could be considered a "minister" is what's left to be decided in lower court, Diskin explained in a call Monday afternoon. She said that they plan to reach out to the Mission to discuss next steps.

"We hope that we can reach an agreement that preserves the intent of the Washington Supreme Court," Diskin said. "If not, what we'll do is go back to court and establish more facts about the job duties of these legal clinic staff attorneys and whether they are ministerial."

The Union Gospel Mission has yet to comment about Monday's Supreme Court decision.

In 2016, the city of Seattle contracted with the Mission to help with outreach to homeless people living in The Jungle, a long piece of greenbelt along Interstate 5 that has a history of holding encampments, before it was cleared of residents.

The case highlighted ongoing conflict in a local and national social services infrastructure that relies heavily on religious institutions.

Religious nonprofits make up a crucial part of the homelessness services system both in Seattle and across the country. One 2016 analysis found that religious organizations provided 41% of the country's emergency homeless shelter beds for adults.


The issue of hiring LGBTQ+ employees has roiled religious agencies in the Seattle area for years. As recently as 2018, the parent agency of World Concern, a Christian development agency headquartered in Seattle, told World Concern's former board president he would not be invited to serve another term after he came out as gay.

Four years earlier, outrage in response to a Federal Way-based Christian development organization's decision to allow same-sex couples on staff prompted the agency, World Vision, to reverse its decision two days later.

Woods said that he was driven to see this case through because he, as a white cisgender bisexual man, felt he had a lot of privilege to help others who face even more layers of oppression.

"I think that was the heart of it for me," he said.

Currently, the Supreme Court has a different but similar dispute on its docket, involving a Colorado web designer who says her religious beliefs prevent her from offering wedding website designs to gay couples. That case is expected to be argued in the fall.

©2022 The Seattle Times. Visit Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.


blog comments powered by Disqus