Business

/

ArcaMax

Seattle's JumpStart tax on big businesses' salaries upheld by WA court

Sarah Grace Taylor, The Seattle Times on

Published in Business News

An appellate court judge upheld Seattle's JumpStart payroll tax on Tuesday, doubling down on a decision made in King County Superior Court last year.

In an opinion published Tuesday, the Division I Court of Appeals deemed Seattle's JumpStart tax lawful, affirming a lower-court dismissal of a lawsuit filed by the Chamber of Commerce in late 2020.

"Engaging in business is a substantial privilege on which the city may

properly levy taxes," the opinion reads. "And the use of a business's payroll expense is an appropriate measure of that taxable incident."

The tax, passed by the Seattle City Council in 2020, requires businesses with at least $7 million in annual payroll to pay between 0.7% and 2.4% on salaries and wages paid to Seattle employees who make at least $150,000 per year. The highest rate is applied only to salaries of at least $400,000 at companies with at least $1 billion in annual payroll.

In 2021, the first year of collection, JumpStart brought the city $231 million in revenue, exceeding the city's $200 million estimate.

While the companies are responsible for the tax, some believe JumpStart is an unlawful tax on those making a living wage, citing Cary v. Bellingham. The 1952 Washington Supreme Court case deemed taxes on net income as illegal property taxes.

The recent lawsuit was originally filed by the Seattle Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce in December 2020, when the chamber asked the King County Superior Court to strike down the tax, calling it "illegal, invalid and unenforceable."

After the initial lawsuit was dismissed by a King County Superior Court judge last summer, the chamber appealed the decision.

 

In a written statement Tuesday, the chamber did not indicate whether it planned to appeal the decision.

"The chamber brought the payroll tax lawsuit forward because we believe the tax is illegal based on Washington State Supreme Court precedent," Chamber President Rachel Smith said. "We will review the decision and determine our next step in consultation with our members and our attorneys."

Smith also criticized the city's use of the tax revenue, citing the city's projected $117 million revenue shortfall in 2023.

"It is our hope, and the expectation of the voters via the latest Index research, that during the upcoming budget process the city of Seattle will look at all the revenue and resources it has and craft a budget that reflects the priorities of the voters," Smith said.

Councilmember Teresa Mosqueda, who chairs the council's budget committee and championed JumpStart, celebrated the decision.

"Thanks to the city's legal team and the broad coalition of businesses, labor unions, community-based organizations, affordable housing advocates, environmental groups, immigrant rights activists, and more — all who built JumpStart Seattle — our progressive payroll tax continues to be the law of the land," Mosqueda wrote in a statement Tuesday.

"JumpStart has been — and thanks to today's victory — will continue to be, one of Seattle's biggest tools to address our city's most urgent problems," she added.

©2022 The Seattle Times. Visit seattletimes.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
 

Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus