With votes finally tallied, the hard-right coalition in Northern California's Shasta County learns its fate

Matt Plummer, a nonprofit advisor, beat incumbent Patrick Jones, a gun store manager who championed dumping Dominion. Plummer won nearly 60% of the vote.

Allen Long, a retired Redding police lieutenant and relative moderate, won an open board seat representing western Shasta County. In a four-way contest, he won 50.13% of the vote, avoiding a November runoff election by just 14 votes.

Mary Rickert, an incumbent and moderate Republican who often clashed with the hard-right majority, won 40% of the vote and is headed for a runoff against quarry owner Corkey Harmon. The third person in that race, Win Carpenter, a prominent far-right voice in the State of Jefferson secessionist movement, did not advance to the general election.

Rickert said the electorate sent “a strong message that people in Shasta County felt like they wanted new faces on the board.”

The outlier, she said, was Crye’s defeat of the recall. But that, she said, may be in part because he was able to make the race about a man who is almost universally unpopular in the county: Gov. Gavin Newsom.

Crye argued that a vote against him was a vote for Newsom to appoint his interim successor. An anti-recall campaign website put it bluntly: “Stop Gavin Newsom’s Attempt to Control Shasta County.”

Many voters seemed to agree with that sentiment. More than 55% of county voters approved a measure — placed on the ballot by the ultraconservative majority — to make Shasta a “charter county” instead of a “general law” county, giving the supervisors, not the governor, the power to fill vacancies on the Board of Supervisors.

Crye called that a victory too.

“It gives Shasta County local control forever,” he said. “It keeps the governor out of our county — any governor. I don’t care if Trump were the governor. I don’t want any outside, Sacramento politician having any rule as it relates to the Board of Supervisors in Shasta County.”

The committee that tried to recall Crye, meanwhile, said it hoped the supervisor would heed how close he came to losing his seat.

“The Committee to Recall Kevin Crye undertook this recall because of the chaos and waste brought on by Crye’s decisions,” backers said in a statement. “Crye would do well to take seriously the thousands of his own constituents who don’t agree with what he’s doing or how he’s doing it.”