Trump's race-baiting rhetoric is not political calculation. It's simply who he is.
WASHINGTON -- President Trump's race-baiting attack on African-American athletes is nothing new. During the civil rights movement, blacks in the South who dared to stand up for justice were often punished by being fired from their jobs. Trump is demanding that National Football League team owners act like the white segregationists of old.
It was gratifying to see the overwhelming rejection of Trump's hideous rabble-rousing by NFL players, owners and fans. But let's be clear: There is no reason, at this point, to give Trump the benefit of any doubt. We should assume Trump's words and actions reflect what he truly believes.
His opening salvo, delivered Friday at a campaign rally in Alabama, could not have been clearer, or cruder: "Wouldn't you love to see one of these NFL owners, when somebody disrespects our flag, to say, 'Get that son of a bitch off the field right now. Out! He's fired. He's fired!'"
Trump was referring, of course, to players who take a knee during the singing of the national anthem. The practice was started by quarterback Colin Kaepernick -- and adopted by a smattering of players around the league, almost all of them black -- as a way of protesting police shootings of unarmed African-Americans.
Trump claimed in a Monday tweet that "the issue of kneeling has nothing to do with race," but that is a lie. Kaepernick's method of protest had everything to do with race, as its intent was to focus attention on racial injustice.
Trump was speaking to a virtually all-white audience in the Deep South. About 70 percent of players in the NFL are African-American. Some political analysts put two and two together and concluded that Trump was playing to the racial anxieties and animosities of his base. If this is true, however, he seems to have miscalculated.
Hundreds of players, black and white, protested during the anthem on Sunday by kneeling, linking arms or, in some cases, declining to take the field until the music was over. Many coaches and owners joined in. Almost all team owners released statements defending the players' right to protest, including New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft, a friend of Trump's who contributed $1 million to his inauguration committee and gave him a Super Bowl ring. Kraft said he was "deeply disappointed" by Trump's remarks.
Perhaps stung by the near-unanimity of the NFL's reaction, Trump sought refuge by appealing to an audience he might have expected to be friendlier. "So proud of NASCAR and its supporters and fans. They won't put up with disrespecting our Country or our Flag," he tweeted Monday.
But a half-hour later, NASCAR's most popular driver, Dale Earnhardt Jr., responded by tweeting, "All Americans R granted rights 2 peaceful protests." Maybe next Trump will try his luck with the professional rodeo circuit.
Trump's intent, I assume, was to create a wedge issue, with patriots on one side -- his side -- and non-patriots on the other. He did not realize that so many people who might dispute Kaepernick's position on police violence would nevertheless defend the players' right to take a stand, or a knee. We have a president who does not understand our fundamental freedoms.