Lindsey Graham is Refreshingly Unfiltered

WASHINGTON -- Ask Sen. Lindsey Graham his greatest political accomplishment, and the South Carolina Republican does not point to any individual piece of legislation. Rather, he says, it is that "I have not become job scared. I have not been so enamored with the job that I'm scared to lose it."

It is possible to respond to this with a shot of cynicism. After all, there is a making-lemonade-from-lemons aspect to Graham's answer: His quests to bridge the bipartisan divide on issues such as immigration and climate change have not produced a big bill emblazoned with his name.

There is, as well, a Janis Joplin, freedom's-just-another-word-for-nothing-left to-lose aspect to Graham's current quest: His bid for the Republican presidential nomination job is so much of a long shot that he might as well say exactly what he thinks.

And yet, there is, and has long been, something alluring about Graham's relative lack of a filter, an unvarnished authenticity in the age of the relentlessly focus-grouped pol. I was reminded of this quality when Graham sat down for an interview Monday with me and my Washington Post colleague Michael Gerson (it was his question that elicited the "job scared" answer).

Most notably, Graham has been the GOP field's swiftest and most barbed critic of Donald Trump and his noxious comments about illegal immigration.

While other Republican politicians may be "worried about offending people who are upset," Graham said of Trump's remarks, "this is not about illegal immigration anymore. It's about how Republicans view people. ... If we don't speak clearly here, we're making a mistake for the ages."

Graham himself drew the connection to "radical Islam," yet it is telling that, when asked which book besides the Bible has most shaped his thinking, Graham cited William Shirer's "The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich."

He was particularly struck, Graham said, by the author's depiction of "how you could take a very educated public and, due to economic distress, they could turn into something very evil. Demagoguery. Making someone the scapegoat. Germany as a cultured country: How could it go from there, before World War I, to where it was in 1939? It's a fascinating understanding of people. And you always have to be on your guard."

Graham's presidential candidacy is most impelled by, and most identified with, his concern about radical Islam and his conviction that defeating this threat will require more time, and far more U.S. troops, than President Obama has acknowledged.

But he speaks with near-equal passion about a domestic issue that has all but disappeared from the campaign conversation: entitlement reform, and the importance of a balanced approach to achieving it. Here Graham is the only candidate willing to say two words that have become ideological poison for both sides: Simpson-Bowles.

...continued

swipe to next page