Jonathan Gruber Should Rethink His Notion of 'Stupidity'
Was Obamacare sold on a pack of lies or just political spin? Questions like that have turned Jonathan Gruber, who helped to create President Barack Obama's health care plan, into a possible threat to its survival.
That's why Obamacare opponents can barely contain the glee beneath their outspoken outrage over the MIT economist's insensitive remarks about voters' intelligence and the Affordable Care Act that he helped to create.
Their delight comes largely from audible confirmation, delivered with Gruber's sarcasm, of the right wing's worst stereotypes of liberals as arrogant, underhanded, smarty-pants elitists -- as if conservatives never, ever would fit that description.
In a year-old video that recently surfaced, for example, Gruber describes Obamacare's legislative history like this.
"This bill was written in a tortured way to make sure (the bipartisan Congressional Budget Office) did not score the mandate as taxes," he said at an academic conference. "If CBO scored the mandate as taxes, the bill dies, OK?"
My comment: Excuse me, but I am shocked, shocked to hear that an administration would try to shape legislation in a way that will make it look good to the CBO.
Seriously, Washington seems to have more euphemisms for taxes than most people have for sex. Substitutions for the T-word famously have been running amok in Washington for decades. They include "fees," "inflows," "balancing," "closing loopholes" and "revenue enhancements."
Yet Gruber happily sounds like he's just discovered such age-old spin. "Lack of transparency is a huge political advantage," he says, "and basically, you know, call it the stupidity of the American voter or whatever, but basically, that was really, really critical to getting this thing to pass."
Oh, please. As the president has responded to Gruber, the Obamacare debate was hardly a secret. It came in two Senate committees, three house committees, extensive public hearings and days of floor debate preceded passage, not to mention weeks of fruitless attempts between Republican and Democratic Senate negotiators to reach a compromise onto which Republicans might sign. In the end, they didn't, but not for lack of trying.
Gruber again: "If you have a law that makes explicit that healthy people pay in and sick people get money, it wouldn't have passed."
...continued
(c) 2014 CLARENCE PAGE DISTRIBUTED BY TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.
