Your email address is safe with us. View our Privacy policy.
Author Bio:
Before starting his popular political column for the New York Observer, Joe Conason worked as editor-at-large for Conde Nast's Details magazine. ...
Read more about Joe Conason.
Before starting his popular political column for the New York Observer, Joe Conason worked as editor-at-large for Conde Nast's Details magazine. ...
Read more about Joe Conason.
A Nobel for Defeating Cheneyism
Joe Conason
Outraged babble and sanctimonious tut-tutting over President Obama's
Nobel Peace Prize will pour forth until the very evening he accepts
the prize in Oslo, and then for years afterward. His critics are
infuriated, they say, because he didn't earn the prestigious award, or
because he didn't refuse it -- or just because those left-wing
Norwegians have a lot of nerve. How dare they insult us by bestowing
their highest honor on the president of the United States and inviting
him to deliver a lecture?
The conservative media machine has nearly seized up, filling hours of airtime, reams of newsprint and zillions of pixels with glowing rage.
A columnist for The Wall Street Journal, usually known for her saccharine sentimentality, calls the award "wicked and ignorant." A radio talker with an enormous audience says that the Nobel committee "suicide-bombed itself" and declared that he is on the same side with the Taliban and Iran in their disdain for the committee's choice.
A nutty host on Fox News Channel suggests that the president had delayed escalating the war in Afghanistan in order to win the prize. An even nuttier and far more celebrated Fox News host insists that the Nobel Prize is merely the latest development in a conspiracy by "global interests that have extraordinary power." (And the Republican National Committee chairman dispatched a quick direct-mail hit, hoping to channel all the anger into cash.)
Following closely behind this flood of bile from the right came the sour emissions of mainstream commentators, who either demand that the president reject the prize or warn that it will hurt more than help.
Stirred up as the wingnuts seem to be, neither they nor their friends in the media possess much understanding of this little episode. If the hotheads understood how Obama actually did earn the prize, in the minds not only of the Norwegians but presumably most of the world's inhabitants, their fury might reach nuclear levels.
The five members of the Nobel committee are much too polite to explain their decision in unambiguous terms. All were selected by Norway's parliament, in accordance with the terms of Alfred Nobel's will, and are politicians themselves. That could be why they were so impressed by the American president's single big and undeniable accomplishment last November: He inflicted a clear political defeat on those excitable extremists and their politicians, and removed them from power before they could do any further damage to world peace and security.
He kicked out the neoconservative faction, led by former Vice President Dick Cheney, that prefers armed confrontation to diplomacy -- and the world applauded in relief, along with the majority of Americans. Whatever the new president may or may not have done since then, nobody beyond a minority of diehards would wish the Cheney faction to return.
Stopping John McCain, a neoconservative belligerent, and his dangerously clueless sidekick, Sarah Palin, was a significant achievement -- and a close call until the final week or so. That is what he did, along with millions of other Americans. It is not a mere aspiration or a hope or a pretty speech.
Will the prize help Obama? For a fair assessment of that issue, it is helpful to know who gave it to him. Conspiracy theorists and smug commentators alike contend that the prize is somehow diminished by a supposed association with the left, always neglecting to note in their own ignorance that such figures as Henry Kissinger were among the recipients back when Norway's parliament was thoroughly dominated by Socialists.
While the committee's current chairman is indeed a leader of the social democratic Labor Party, two of the members of the committee that voted unanimously to honor Obama are politicians of the right. The deputy chairman is the former leader of Norway's Young Conservatives, and another member also belongs to a conservative party.
Right and left, the world agrees that Obama is a refreshing change. He is restoring the prestige and admiration squandered by the Bush-Cheney regime, as worldwide surveys have lately proved. The prize is merely a symbol of what has already happened -- and what may someday help the president to achieve his most important international objectives.
========
Joe Conason writes for the New York Observer (www.observer.com). To find out more about Joe Conason, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.
Copyright 2009 Creators Syndicate Inc.
This news arrived on: 10/15/2009
Printer Friendly Version | Send this page to a friend | Post Comment
Rate This Story:
Great - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 - Bad
Posted Comments:
10-20-2009 11:53
casey42 wrote:
The right wing seems to be represented by cowards who wish to hide behind anononimity instead of signing their work, that is why when they gather together they wear sheets to keep people from knowing who they are.
Winning the election and getting the greedy republicans out of office was enough to gain Mr. Obama the prize.
Winning the election and getting the greedy republicans out of office was enough to gain Mr. Obama the prize.
10-20-2009 04:42
JCE wrote:
They coulda given Bush the booby prize for pretending to fight the terrorists, all the while sending them billions a day in oil money, and letting our country pay a high price for their drugs. Without our oil and drug money, the terrorists would be out of business. So it is all a nasty game we play, kinda like the cold war was. You can tell the Obama haters all day long why he won, and why he should have got it, but they are immune to the truth. Hate does carry big blinders.
10-20-2009 03:04
african wrote:
Sorry to disappoint you - but the rest of the world does NOT in fact agree with the decision. I live in South Africa,(a country that almost blew a gasket with excitement when he became pres) and I know you lot dont care 2 hoots about us, but a number of polls here indicate an average 70% of us being against it. How does he compare agaainst Mandela? Puhleeseeee.....
10-20-2009 01:37
Howard wrote:
Different comments
OK people; Who should have gotten the NOBEL PEACE AWARD? George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfield? They all were in Cahoots in the invasion of a NEUTRAL COUNTRY THAT POSED NO THREAT TO THE UNITED STATES! OH yeah, they did it to GET SADDAM HUSSINE FOR THREATENING TO ASSINATE GEORGE H.W. BUSH! Why don't we invade MEXICO, those DRUG CARTELLS THREATENED TO ASSINATE GEORGE W. BUSH AND NOW BARACK OBAMA! SO, WHO should have gotten the NOBEL PEACE AWARD? MAYBE OLE' RUSH LIMBURGER ( LIMBAUGH), YEAH RIGHT, HE IS NOTHING BUT A BIG BLOW HARD WHO WISHES PRESIDENT OBAMA WILL FAIL! LOTS OF LUCK RUSH, NOT A CHANCE!
10-20-2009 00:19
oldcowboy wrote:
To wrote:
Another squeal from a righty who wants to be nameless.
Comment archive | Comment FAQ's
 |
 |
|
View Joe Conason ezine stories by date or visit the complete archive |
The ArcaMax Politics channel is one of 70 content categories offered by ArcaMax Publishing on this ... |
VideoSquares.com
