From the ArcaMax Publishing, Joe Conason Newsletter:
http://www.arcamax.com/news/joeconason/s-372545-353216
Despite all the feigned outrage fanned by the mainstream media and the
right-wing noisemakers, Wesley Clark -- retired four-star general,
former Supreme Commander of NATO, wounded and highly decorated veteran
of ground combat in Vietnam and a military man to his core --
assuredly did not denigrate the war record of John McCain when he
talked about the Republican candidate on television last Sunday.
Instead, perhaps naively, Gen. Clark stated a very simple fact. Mr.
McCain's service in Vietnam doesn't prove his aptitude or competence
to serve in the nation's highest office. Or as he told "Face the
Nation" host Bob Schieffer on CBS: "I don't think riding in a fighter
plane and getting shot down is a qualification to be president."
Nor with all due respect is withstanding long captivity and torture by
the North Vietnamese. "I certainly honor his service as a prisoner of
war. He was a hero to me, and to hundreds of thousands and millions of
others in the armed forces, as a prisoner of war," said Gen. Clark.
The reservations he expressed were clear and honest, requiring no
apology and no scuttling repudiation by Barack Obama.
Supporters of Mr. McCain insist that his military service should be
exempt from discussion, except when they feel like bringing it up to
prove some point about national security, terrorism or the presidency
that it really doesn't prove at all. But of course he was not the only
soldier, sailor or airman to survive such experiences with courage and
nobility. There was once another former POW whose candidacy for high
office vindicates the Clark argument.
Or has everyone forgotten Adm. Stockdale?
The late James Bond Stockdale epitomized the bravery and idealism of
the Americans imprisoned and tormented, both physically and mentally,
by their captors in Hanoi. Captured and beaten after his Navy jet was
shot down, he lived in leg irons for two years and in solitary
confinement for four years between September 1965 and February 1973,
when he was finally released. His many honors and citations included
the Medal of Honor, and he rose to vice admiral. He was a man of
indisputable intelligence who taught philosophy at Stanford University
and wrote several books before he died of Alzheimer's disease three
years ago.
Yet the sad truth is that Stockdale lived out his final years in the
shadow of his disappointing independent candidacy for vice president
as industrialist Ross Perot's running mate in 1992. He knew little
about policy or politics, as roughly 70 million Americans discovered
with a wince as they watched a televised debate that pitted him
against Al Gore and Dan Quayle.
"Who am I? Why am I here?" were his opening lines, a bid to
acknowledge his inexperience that left audiences laughing at him.
Although he sounded refreshingly unscripted by comparison with his
opponents, Stockdale's evident confusion and unreadiness left him
looking like a "bewildered grandfather," as Maureen Dowd put it.
Everybody liked Stockdale, but nobody thought he should be running for
vice president, and the notion that he might sit a heartbeat from the
Oval Office raised serious questions about Mr. Perot's judgment.
Stockdale was too honorable and too wise to claim that the answer to
his own question -- "Why am I here?" -- should be found in his
matchless military record or his epic POW experience. After his
humiliation in the debate, he liked to say that he was the candidate
of "the people," but although the people liked him, they didn't vote
for him.
The Stockdale episode also highlights the bias and hypocrisy behind
the fury over Gen. Clark's comments. In the days following the October
1992 debate, Stockdale was roasted from all sides, with much of the
most withering commentary emanating from the self-styled superpatriots
of the far right, who were angry about the Perot candidacy and worried
that Bill Clinton would win the election, as he did.
So a headline in "The Washington Times" called Stockdale a loser, and
conservative columnists denigrated him as "geezerish," "lame" and "the
big loser." Rush Limbaugh, who evaded the Vietnam draft thanks to an
inflamed boil on his behind, devoted nearly an entire broadcast to
mocking Stockdale. After playing a clip of the admiral defending
abortion rights, the radio host described him as "intellectually
vacant" and "pandering" and suggested that his pro-choice views were
insincere.
Incidentally, the Limbaugh show's producer back in October of 1992 was
none other than Roger Ailes, who now heads Fox News Channel, where the
faked anger over the Clark comments has swiftly reached a seething
boil. He's a phony, and so is this latest eruption of right-wing
indignation.
========
Joe Conason writes for the New York Observer (www.observer.com). To
find out more about Joe Conason, visit the Creators Syndicate website
at www.creators.com.