Your email address is safe with us. View our Privacy policy.
Author Bio:
Columnist and economic advisor Lawrence Kudlow started out his career as chief economist for several Wall Street firms. He served as the associate...
Read more about Lawrence Kudlow.
Columnist and economic advisor Lawrence Kudlow started out his career as chief economist for several Wall Street firms. He served as the associate...
Read more about Lawrence Kudlow.
President Zero Sum Goes to Asia
Lawrence Kudlow
President Obama took his declining dollar to the Asia-Pacific economic
conference, and he added to it a declinist opinion of America's
economy. His big message? Don't count on American consumers to lead
the world from recession to recovery and beyond. His second big
message? In the U.S., we must save more and spend less.
Huh? This is the same limits-to-growth, central-planning wisdom we hear so often these days at home. It's also tone deaf, to say the least. Despite a sinking greenback that is wreaking havoc among the Asian economies, and in the face of repeated currency warnings by Asian officials, Obama brought no King Dollar stabilization message to the conference.
Before getting into the currency question, let me say this: I think more saving (and investment) by U.S. citizens is a great idea. But this need not come at the expense of consumption. In a prosperous free economy, people should be able to save, invest, work and spend as much as they like. More is better than less in each case. Grow the pie larger.
Of course, if the president and his team want more saving and investment, they should end the multiple taxation of saving and investment. Unfortunately, our system taxes saving as income, capital gains, dividends and inheritance.
Team Obama also intends to tax wealth more by raising the top personal tax rate from 35 percent to 40 percent. And they apparently don't object to Nancy Pelosi's plan to slap another 5.4 percent tax on the incomes and capital gains of successful earners in order to finance a government takeover of health care.
Wealth is a crucial form of saving. And the investment that comes from extra saving is used to finance the entrepreneurial start-ups that create the jobs and incomes that allow families to spend. However, by creating a zero-sum game between saving and spending, the Obama planners are falling into an austerity trap -- one that would hand the American economy a second-place finish in the global race for capital and growth.
At the same time, Obama has no plan to stabilize King Dollar, and the Asian economies don't like it. China's top banking regulator said the Federal Reserve's money-creating binge was the main cause of "massive speculation." Similar sentiments came from top officials in Hong Kong, Singapore and Japan.
And while Ben Bernanke tried to calm dollar worries during his recent speech at the New York Economics Club, it was clear that the greenback's value ranks low on his priority list. Nothing but dollar lip service from the Fed head.
Because of the slumping dollar, U.S. import prices have jumped 10 percent at an annual rate over the past three months, and nearly 6 percent excluding energy. This is a tax hike on consumers and businesses, and it could depress holiday sales. It's reminiscent of the gigantic energy shock of 2008 that was caused by the dollar's collapse.
And what's the current U.S solution to the dollar problem? Blame China, and call for a revaluation of the yuan. But beggar-thy-neighbor protectionism never works, and it causes bad blood between the countries involved.
The powerful Asian economies actually have a better idea. They want to move toward a free-trade currency-cooperation zone -- much like the euro zone, fathered by Nobel economist Robert Mundell. This makes more sense in terms of world price stability and free capital flows. But the U.S. refuses to play.
So Japan, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan and others are forced to desperately buy sinking dollars in order to protect their export industries. But this only creates inflationary money expansion. The beleaguered U.S. dollar is in effect exporting U.S. inflation overseas.
President Obama did talk about entering free-trade discussions. But his commerce secretary, Gary Locke, threw cold water on the idea in a Singapore speech. He said trade agreements have to wait because of a crowded U.S. legislative agenda. (Hat tip: James Pethokoukis.) He may have a point: The South Korean free-trade bill has been languishing for several years in the Democratic Congress.
Then there's the massive U.S. health care takeover plan, which is now estimated at $3 trillion. This additional dollar depressant will tax the patience of China, Japan and other would-be buyers of our massive debt creation.
We cannot spend, tax or devalue our way into prosperity. Nor can we command the respect of other nations by telling them our economy cannot grow as rapidly in the future as it has in the past.
Ironically, these same Asian countries -- with their accelerated growth rates -- have borrowed a page from American free-market capitalism. Yet Obama makes no defense of our free-market system and provides no leadership on the leading economic questions.
In terms of global leadership, Ronald Reagan would say: "If not us, who? If not now, when?" It's a pity that President Obama doesn't share the Gipper's commitment to American leadership.
========
To find out more about Lawrence Kudlow and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.
Copyright 2009 Creators Syndicate Inc.
This news arrived on: 11/19/2009
Printer Friendly Version | Send this page to a friend | Post Comment
Rate This Story:
Great - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 - Bad
Posted Comments:
11-21-2009 02:55
JCE wrote:
Excellent, pertinent, and well thought out posts, except, as usual, redneck again and redneck. It doesn't matter about taxes except for two things. How much you have when you are finished, and what you get for it. The rich pay the least, when they pay at all, but they have plenty afterward. The middle class, and poor, all too often have nothing. And what do the rich get? Legislation for them, tax breaks, exemptions, and what does the rest of us get? More taxes, less representation, and the privilege of watching the rich take away our jobs, and run the country. Doesn't seem fair at all, this double standard of the republicans.
11-21-2009 01:07
WCM wrote:
Redneck
I'd bet you I'm much more conservative on most issues, than those who are always talking about how conservative they are.I call the usual Republican style of conservatism,surface conservatism.The chest thumpers are usually big spenders when it doesn't cost them any of their own treasure.As long as the normal hard working folks are picking up the tab,there's no limit to what they will spend. The billionaire boys club are happy as long as the government is spending exclusively on their pet projects, but God forbid that anything be done for the common people,who really pay most of the taxes in the first place.We don't get the loop holes to use.Your Reaganomics only works for the wealthy.It hurts the common people and our country.
11-20-2009 22:59
Kathie wrote:
Sorry about the two posts. It didn't take the first one, but then it showed up. ?????
11-20-2009 22:57
Kathie wrote:
I am really tired of everyone praising Reagan for being such a great president, and for supposedly having the economy in such great shape. The current unemployment rate has not been this high since "1983". Who was the president in 1983? Ronald Reagan, and he was already in the third year of his term.
I don't agree with everything Obama is doing, but lets at least give the guy a chance to clean up the mess he inherited. It will take longer than one year.
I don't agree with everything Obama is doing, but lets at least give the guy a chance to clean up the mess he inherited. It will take longer than one year.
11-20-2009 22:50
Kathie wrote:
I am so tired of hearing about how great Reagan was, and how he was so great for the economy. Unemployment rates now have not been this high since 1983. Who was the president in 1983? Ronald Reagan, and he was already in the third year of his term. If he was so great, why the high unemployment?
Comment archive | Comment FAQ's
![]() |
![]() |
View Lawrence Kudlow ezine stories by date or visit the complete archive |
Featured Channel: Politics
The ArcaMax Politics channel is one of 70 content categories offered by ArcaMax Publishing on this ... |











VideoSquares.com