Your email address is safe with us. View our Privacy policy.
Author Bio:
Political consultant Dick Morris has been credited with turning around Bill Clinton's campaign, leading to his second term as President. In ...
Read more about Dick Morris.
Political consultant Dick Morris has been credited with turning around Bill Clinton's campaign, leading to his second term as President. In ...
Read more about Dick Morris.
No Veep Slot for Hillary
Dick Morris
It would be an act of terminal insanity for Barack Obama to name
Hillary Clinton as his vice presidential candidate. It would not help
him get elected, it would drag all the Clinton controversies into the
general election, and having her down the hall in the West Wing would
be a recipe for disaster, dissension and civil war. Other than that,
it's a heck of an idea!
Start with the election. There are two kinds of people who backed Hillary in the primaries: her original supporters and those who joined her later in the game. Her original backers are all solid Democrats whose arms would fall off before they would back anyone who is pro-life.
They are true believers, feminists, pro-choice advocates and older party loyalists who would prefer Hillary, or may have doubts about Obama, but will always fall in line and vote Democratic.
The more recent converts are people who are turned off by Obama's connection to the Rev. Jeremiah Wright and who worry that he might be a closet black radical. Their latent racial fears were heightened by the revelations about Obama's links with Wright, and they voted for Hillary as the lesser of two evils. Putting Mrs. Clinton on the ticket will do nothing to assuage these fears. One wonders if these blue-collar, downscale, racially motivated voters would actually support Hillary against John McCain if she were to win the nomination. They certainly wouldn't follow her into Obama's camp just because she is on the ticket.
Obama's key need in the election is to demonstrate his experience and ability to do the job despite only minimal federal experience. Running with someone whose experience he, himself, derided will hardly solve this problem. Voters only credit Hillary with having experience when her record is compared with Obama's almost total lack of a record. Against McCain, she would do nothing to close the experience gap. Better for Obama to choose a senator with long tenure -- a Chris Dodd of Connecticut or Joseph Biden of Delaware -- just as Michael Dukakis chose Lloyd Bentsen, George W. Bush chose Dick Cheney, and John F. Kennedy chose Lyndon Johnson.
If Obama put Hillary on the ticket, it would re-raise all of the questions about Bill's income sources, what he did for Dubai, what he did for Frank Guistra -- the Canadian mining executive who gave millions to the Clinton library and whom Bill introduced to the president of Kazakhstan -- and whether he will make public his library donors. Who needs those issues, especially when Obama is trying to wage an anti-Washington-influence-peddling campaign?
Finally, having Hillary in the West Wing would be a nightmare. There is no way that Obama could trust her. She would be a throwback to the old days when the president did not consult the vice president on anything, a situation which led Vice President John Nance Garner, FDR's VP during his first two terms, to call the office "not worth a pitcher of warm piss."
If Obama got into trouble, he would have to look over his shoulder at Hillary and he would always have both Bill and Hillary around to show him up, hog the limelight, generate controversy with ill-considered remarks and make life difficult. Would Bill stop giving speeches and making money? Would his ties with Arab nations and questionable American and Canadian businessmen end? Or would Obama have to explain his VP's husband's business dealings over and over again?
And, the ultimate question: Can Bill Clinton be put back into the bottle? Is this recent spate of angry, finger-wagging bursts of inappropriate outrage a permanent fixture of his public persona? Does Obama want to take the risk of having him on the team and having to account for his conduct?
Hillary would add no votes to Obama, she would dog his campaign with scandal, she would be disloyal in office and her husband would be, at best, a huge distraction. Case closed.
========
To find out more about Dick Morris and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com. Distributed By Creators Syndicate Inc.
Copyright 2008 Dick Morris And Eileen Mcgann
This news arrived on: 05/15/2008
Printer Friendly Version | Send this page to a friend | Post Comment
Rate This Story:
Great - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 - Bad
Posted Comments:
05-19-2008 13:03
Ann wrote:
Dickless Morris
Dickless - you should be worried about your own house. You are the one that went over and advised Obama's cousin, Odinga, on his campaign in Kenya and when he lost, his followers went on a rampage killing thousands of people. This man ran his campaign on hope and change, as well.
What a guy you are!!!
What a guy you are!!!
05-17-2008 13:19
Texas Katie wrote:
No Veep for Hillary
Mr. Morris, you are right on the money!
The main difficulty with choosing the VP candidate for Obama is the issue of change and I am very interested in observing just how he deals with it. Chris Dodd and Joseph Biden are excellent choices w/the exception that they are both "insiders" despite have histories of trying to change the system.
Many folks, including the other writers below, miss the point about Obama's abilities ie: The individual capable of organizing the best organized and well-run campaign has already demonstrated the ability to surround him/herself with quality folks rather than party hacks. Do we really want another President who not only makes bad personnel choices but can't understand economics?
Finally - are we seriously planning to base a candidate's integrity on whether or not we agree with his/her spiritual leader? If so, let's take a look @ our current President's - he is very interesting, too!
Let's get real and focus on the dangerous position this country finds ourselves in every area. This isn't tea and crumpets, it is life and death of this country and her citizens. I, for one, don't want to continue fiddling while Rome burns!
The main difficulty with choosing the VP candidate for Obama is the issue of change and I am very interested in observing just how he deals with it. Chris Dodd and Joseph Biden are excellent choices w/the exception that they are both "insiders" despite have histories of trying to change the system.
Many folks, including the other writers below, miss the point about Obama's abilities ie: The individual capable of organizing the best organized and well-run campaign has already demonstrated the ability to surround him/herself with quality folks rather than party hacks. Do we really want another President who not only makes bad personnel choices but can't understand economics?
Finally - are we seriously planning to base a candidate's integrity on whether or not we agree with his/her spiritual leader? If so, let's take a look @ our current President's - he is very interesting, too!
Let's get real and focus on the dangerous position this country finds ourselves in every area. This isn't tea and crumpets, it is life and death of this country and her citizens. I, for one, don't want to continue fiddling while Rome burns!
05-16-2008 17:52
msattitude69 wrote:
VP
There is a huge flaw in your theory. Obama's candidacy is about change, he can't then pick a running mate with tons of experience because to get the experience you have to be part of the political system he wants to change. The only acceptable way to get someone on the ticket with experience is to pick Clinton because he can at least argue that with a such a close race the only way we can unite the party is to have her on the ticket. He could then justify her as a "change agent" by saying that the first woman in that position would clearly bring a different mindset to the job and that is change you can believe in! As a woman I can tell if she is not on the ticket I will vote for Mc Same
05-16-2008 09:29
crone wrote:
Obama running mate
It don't make no never mind who pairs up with Obama, he ain't got what it takes to do the job. He barely qualifies to be the VP and would be dead weight! Why do macho men love to bash Hillary so? Perhaps she has more balls than they do?
05-16-2008 06:39
Jay Hammond wrote:
Obama's running mate
I'm in total agreement with Morris/Morgan. The Clinton duo would be disastrous in the Veep slot.
I have said from the very beginning that New Mexico governor Bill Richardson should be the VP on any Democratic ticket. His experience trumps anyone else on any possible list of choices. An Obama-Richardson slate would put us on the road to correcting a slide which began with Nixon, and hasn't abated in all those years. However, "Beware the Ides of March!"
I have said from the very beginning that New Mexico governor Bill Richardson should be the VP on any Democratic ticket. His experience trumps anyone else on any possible list of choices. An Obama-Richardson slate would put us on the road to correcting a slide which began with Nixon, and hasn't abated in all those years. However, "Beware the Ides of March!"
Comment archive | Comment FAQ's
![]() |
![]() |
|
View Dick Morris ezine stories by date or visit the complete archive |
Featured Channel: Politics
The ArcaMax Politics channel is one of 70 content categories offered by ArcaMax Publishing on this ... |












ArcaMax Dating