Comment Archive for "What John McCain Told Me, And What It Says About How Far He's Fallen":
Return to Story | Post a Comment
Posted Comments:
05-09-2008 12:06
Thom wrote:
Change...
Obama wants Change...
Of course on the other hand, Adolf Hitler used a platform of change to get elected back in teh 1930's.
Hitler promised a stong government
Adolf rebuilt the Nazi Party, a political party at the time.
Sure Obama is a Brilliant Speaker...
Adolf Hitler was touted as a brilliant speaker!
Sure, Obama's views are popular since they were simply the views of the people repeated back at them...
Adolf Hitler's views were also very popular as they were simply the views of the people repeated back at them!
Obama has virtually promised to end unemployment.
Hitler promised to end unemployment!
Sure, Obama has huge crowds show up at his rallies to listen to him...
Adolf Hitler rallied huge crowds to support him!
Obama's primary support comes from the huge middle class who are being told everyday in the Obama supporting media that they face economic ruin without Obama.
Hitler's main support came from the middle classwho were ruined by the 29 economic depression.
Obama has blamed a single group, corporate america, for all of America's problems.
Hitler blamed a single group, jews, for all of Germany's problems.
Obama is a strong leader who has absolute control of the Democratic party.
Hitler was a strong leader who had absolute control of the Nazi Party.
Are we sure that Change under these terms is teh shange we really want?
Are we sure that the change Obama speaks of isnt't a change that merely represents repeating history?
"Be careful what you wish for, you may receive it!" The German people got what they wished for and the world suffered for it!
Of course on the other hand, Adolf Hitler used a platform of change to get elected back in teh 1930's.
Hitler promised a stong government
Adolf rebuilt the Nazi Party, a political party at the time.
Sure Obama is a Brilliant Speaker...
Adolf Hitler was touted as a brilliant speaker!
Sure, Obama's views are popular since they were simply the views of the people repeated back at them...
Adolf Hitler's views were also very popular as they were simply the views of the people repeated back at them!
Obama has virtually promised to end unemployment.
Hitler promised to end unemployment!
Sure, Obama has huge crowds show up at his rallies to listen to him...
Adolf Hitler rallied huge crowds to support him!
Obama's primary support comes from the huge middle class who are being told everyday in the Obama supporting media that they face economic ruin without Obama.
Hitler's main support came from the middle classwho were ruined by the 29 economic depression.
Obama has blamed a single group, corporate america, for all of America's problems.
Hitler blamed a single group, jews, for all of Germany's problems.
Obama is a strong leader who has absolute control of the Democratic party.
Hitler was a strong leader who had absolute control of the Nazi Party.
Are we sure that Change under these terms is teh shange we really want?
Are we sure that the change Obama speaks of isnt't a change that merely represents repeating history?
"Be careful what you wish for, you may receive it!" The German people got what they wished for and the world suffered for it!
05-09-2008 12:03
Thomas wrote:
Change...
"Be careful what you wish for, you may receive it!" The German people got what they wished for and the world suffered for it!
05-09-2008 11:43
esbuck wrote:
McCain and the media
When will we hear the story about how McCain started the fire on the Forrestal which killed 167 people? The fuel came from his A-4, which was improperly started. Was he incompetent to fly it, or was he engaging in a prank?
05-09-2008 11:30
Kenneth wrote:
Huffington BS
Just months AFTER 911, I was at a dinner party where Arianna Huffington was overheard stating that "George Bush was the greatest thing to happen to America, especially after 911". She continued with a derrogatory remark referencing "can you imagine how that idiot Gore would have responded to this horrific event".
I find it simply amazing how Arianna and most other liberal democrats can chagne the color of their spots so easily and affortlessly when the need or desire suites them at the moment.
I find it simply amazing how Arianna and most other liberal democrats can chagne the color of their spots so easily and affortlessly when the need or desire suites them at the moment.
05-09-2008 11:00
Keith wrote:
McCain
So, it's wrong if McCain changes his views, BUT PERFECTLY okay for Sen. Clinton to change her veiws at every new poll?!? With both Obama and Clinton, you get what you want to hear at that paticular moment in time! With McCain, you get only facts, EVEN IF YOU DON'T AGREE WITH THEM! I would rather have someone who stands by what he/she believes in, then to have ANYONE who only believes in WHAT THE NEXT POLL SUGGESTS!
05-09-2008 07:53
John Beach wrote:
The Stress of Process
Stress creates anger and confusion. The stress of the length and intensity and basic competitive nature of a presidential campaign has to take a toll on the candidates as well as the people they are trying to get to vote for them. Their humanity shows through, their mistakes and purposeful misrepresentations (lies, for lack of a more accurate, less accusatory term) all get broadcast repeatedly for the feeding frenzy that will naturally ensue.
The choices are limited. The few who wanted the job are narrowed down by the process to fewer and the choices are there. We don't like the length of the process, the tenor or tone of it and we are left with a feeling that, regardless of who wins, we won't be satisfied because all the muck, truth and untruth, that could be raked has been revealed and repeated and would you want that person with those flaws representing you and your country? Neither party's candidates has a monopoly on purity and perfection this year. but it has gotten old. fast!
The choices are limited. The few who wanted the job are narrowed down by the process to fewer and the choices are there. We don't like the length of the process, the tenor or tone of it and we are left with a feeling that, regardless of who wins, we won't be satisfied because all the muck, truth and untruth, that could be raked has been revealed and repeated and would you want that person with those flaws representing you and your country? Neither party's candidates has a monopoly on purity and perfection this year. but it has gotten old. fast!
05-09-2008 05:26
Nemo wrote:
Sane
OK, so they are below and not above. Big deal!
05-09-2008 05:25
Nemo wrote:
Sane
Reasonable people are of a common mind. See the two comments above. Both were submitted at exactly the same time. Both say basically the same thing.
05-09-2008 05:22
Nemo wrote:
Typical
Typical chatter from a jealous and disconnected Democrat. While the core of her message has some truth about it, she could't resist pouring on the coal to make things seem worse than they are.
05-09-2008 05:22
jim wrote:
Typical democratic chatter everyboidy has to hate hate. And Obbama is going to bring the country together with writters like this. You know this type of talk blames Bush if it is going to rain today. Mow saying Mc Cain didn't vote for Bush is very small. I think the real problem with this country the deviceness of the democratic party to lie and cheat to split the people.

ArcaMax Dating