Get these FREE newsletters in your email!

Alexander Cockburn

See more great free newsletters
on the subscribe page.

Type your email address:

Your email address is safe with us. View our Privacy policy.

Religion:
Enjoy religious news and spiritual inspiration on the religion page
The Funnies:
Get free jokes, comics, and more! See them all on
our funnies page
Author Bio:
Political journalist Alexander Cockburn (pronounced CO-burn) began his career at the University of Oxford, working as a reporter and commentator in...

Read more about Alexander Cockburn.
Books:
Read the classics online or by email. More details on the books page
Games:
Fun online games, quizzes, hangman and more on the games page
Alexander Cockburn

A Year of Obama

Alexander Cockburn
A year after Obama's triumphant election, hauling substantial majorities in the House and Senate on his coattails, the progressive sector sits trying to warm its hands before the bonfire of all its hopes. An awful "health reform" bill has cleared the House and is now headed for marriage with some even more ghastly Senate version from which we may be saved only by a filibustering Lieberman, Obama's initial mentor in the Senate.

Meanwhile, the White House is furiously denying reports from such well-regarded correspondents as David Martin of CBS that Gen. Stanley McChrystal will get "most, if not all," of what he wants. Instead of giving him the boot for insolent public challenges to the civilian executive power, Obama will order the dispatch of about 40,000 new troops (CBS's figure) to Afghanistan, representing a long-term commitment as fateful as Lyndon Johnson's surrender to Gen. Westmoreland's request in Vietnam nearly half a century ago.

The progressives poke about among entrails of the House health bill and find evidence of mini-victories like the survival in vestigial form of the "public option" -- a fetish phrase guaranteed to raise a loyal cheer whatever the realities, which in this case aren't hard to discover.

As Rose Ann DeMoro, executive director of the California Nurses Association, put it in the wake of the House vote, "The principal beneficiary is not Americans' health but the bottom line of the insurance industry, which stands to harvest tens of billions of dollars in additional profits ordered by the federal government." Or as Democratic Rep. Eric Massa of New York warned before the vote, "At the highest level, this bill will enshrine in law the monopolistic powers of the private health insurance industry, period."

And of course, the House bill reduces public protection for women, with its rollback of reproductive rights in the anti-abortion amendment. The "public option" remnant? It will be available to about 2 percent of people under age 65, mostly those now not covered who buy insurance on their own.

It is as ridiculous to claim that this "health reform" bill has anything substantive to do with beneficial social change as to believe there have been any encouraging shifts in foreign policy since the Democrats took over. Only recently, we had the surreal spectacle of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton claiming in a press conference that what Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu "has offered in specifics of a restraint on the policy of settlements, which he has just described -- no new starts, for example -- is unprecedented in the context of the prior two negotiations."

Obama's Afghan policy evolved on the campaign trail last year as a one-liner designed to deflect charges that he was a peacenik on Iraq. He formed a foreign policy team mostly composed of Clinton-era neoliberal hawks, headed by Hillary Clinton and Richard Holbrooke. Then he ordered 17,000 new U.S. troops to be deployed to Afghanistan.

If on his second day in office he'd announced a full and complete review of U.S. aims in Afghanistan, with no option left off the table, he'd have had some purchase on the situation. But the months drifted by, and finally, the worsening situation forced a review of Afghan policy -- precisely when Obama's poll numbers were dropping, the war lobby was heartened and the liberals were already dejected by Obama's surrender to Goldman Sachs and Wall Street, and by his fumbling retreats in the health fight.

It's exactly as I predicted from the start. The past year has yielded one surrender by the administration after another -- whether it be renditions, phone-tapping or an accelerated schedule in giving the finger to organized labor, whose troops had done the most to put Obama in the White House. Even before his election last November, Obama extinguished all hopes -- risible though they were to those who had followed the senator's brief political career -- that he would harvest public fury at Wall Street and curb the power of the banks. He voted for the Bush/Paulson bank bailout and then hired Lawrence Summers -- one of the prime architects of the country's economic death plunge -- as his chief economic adviser. Today, Summers stands alongside Obama in the public pillory, with the rising unemployment figures hanging round his neck.

If you want to see the year's political price for dropping the ball on the greatest political opportunity we'll see in our lifetime to curb the power of Wall Street and set a new economic course, just look at the recent election numbers in Virginia, which voted for a Democratic president last year for the first time since the Johnson sweep of 1964 and handed the Democrats three Republican House seats. In these same three districts earlier in November, Republican Bob McDonnell -- running on a we-need-jobs platform and against a terrible climate bill built on junk science -- clinched the governor's race by huge margins as independents, seniors, suburban voters and stay-at-home Democrats took out their disillusion with Obama.

Progressives delight in depicting a Republican Party captured by the nutballs, dooming itself to the margins. Don't believe it. The "sophisticated right" (so described by C. Wright Mills 60 years ago) equipped with big Republican money will assert its power over the "wild-eyed Utopian capitalists" (Mills again). Glenn Beck will burst the envelope he's already pushing or be impaled on some disclosure from his fraught psychic past. Sarah Palin will be similarly discredited as a public figure. Next November, Republicans can look forward to recapture of the House and a whittling down of Democrats in the Senate by five or six. Then Obama can fire Rahm Emanuel and hire David Gergen, just as Bill Clinton did in the summer of 1993.

========

Alexander Cockburn is co-editor with Jeffrey St. Clair of the muckraking newsletter CounterPunch. He is also co-author of the new book "Dime's Worth of Difference: Beyond the Lesser of Two Evils," available through www.counterpunch.com. To find out more about Alexander Cockburn and read features by other columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

Copyright 2009 Creators Syndicate Inc.

This news arrived on: 11/13/2009
Share this Story
Digg   del.icio.us   Yahoo   Facebook   Google   

Printer Friendly Version | Send this page to a friend | Post Comment


Rate This Story:

Great - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 - Bad




Posted Comments:

11-20-2009 09:40
JK wrote:



JCE, Obama came out of CHICAGO, one of the most corrupt citys in the nation. The only dreamy eyed dreamer is you if you think he didn't know how things work. And Chicago is a Democratic city. The state goverment is no better both partys have more than enough crooks. The thought that he is or was a common normal American makes me laugh. How many common Americans attend a church for 20 years that preaches hate for America? He started his political career in the living room of a domestic terrorist. You must be dreaming if you think he is a common American.



11-19-2009 16:07
JCE wrote:



As a new and young politician, Obama was still enough of a dreamy eyed dreamer. He didn't have the experience to know how corrupt both parties were, and had mostly seen the result of the crooked republicans. He hadn't gotten deep in the pockets of the special interests like most do after 5 or 10 years in office, like most of the long term professionals are. He was still to close to being a common normal American, not a rich elite serving the rich. And Obama actually thought he could do us some good. Maybe he can. At least the senate bill is closer to what Obama asked for. We might yet beat the insurance companies. We know we can't depend on the republicans, but maybe the democrats will come thru for the people. The republicans can still stop it, but if the reconciliation between the not bad senate bill, and the terrible house bill makes a passable bill, the people may yet win.



11-19-2009 15:56
JCE wrote:



Just for the record, and for the right wing extremists and Obama haters who only read and hear what they want to hear, as opposed to hearing all that is said, I have said many times that all politicians are corrupt, that is the nature of the game, honest men don't get far in the profession, and it is why I rejected politics when I was young. I am a pragmatist, and a realist. We can't have an honest person as a politician because the people don't want one. And haven't since our first republican president sided with the rich, and invaded the south, and took away states rights and sovereignty. The only mistakes Obama is making, and he is making quite a few, is in continuing the policies and activities of Bush. The good things he has done, or attempted, and there are a few, is to take on the credit, energy, insurance and some of the other special interests. I have mixed feelings about him trying to include the republicans, and work with them so hard, after I see what they have done to the house health care bill. The senate version is far less insurance friendly, far more people friendly. I understand why he does it, I just don't think it is working very well, unless to show the people how hard they are fighting for the special interests. I guess it depends on the intelligence of the voters, and I don't have much faith in them, after I see the power of the right wing propaganda machine, and how strong the insurance and other special interests are.



11-16-2009 19:45
VGB wrote:

One Year in Office

President Obama is finding that it takes more than a silver tongue to get things done.



11-16-2009 15:44
John W Smith III wrote:



You are right JCE and he didn't know how much corporate cash was influencing the Blue Dog and ConsevDems.We expect that from the Republicans because look how much corporate welfare they gave to them in the last 8 years,tax cuts and nothing to show for it but debt.
HHJ-The RNC insurance covers elective abortion since 1991 and the conservative group Focus on the Family.How do you like your conservatives hypocrites now.LOL!




Comment archive | Comment FAQ's

Post Comment::

Author:
Subject:



Recent archives Featured news

View Alexander Cockburn ezine stories by date or visit the complete archive

Featured Channel: Politics

The ArcaMax Politics channel is one of 70 content categories offered by ArcaMax Publishing on this ...