ARCADIA, Calif. -- The agenda of the May meeting of the California Horse Racing Board at Santa Anita was generally filled with routine procedural matters, leaving center stage to the heightened, and at times, hyperbolic rhetoric over what should be the future of horse racing in California.
The public comment part of Thursday's meeting lasted almost 1 hour, 15 minutes with 21 people allowed up to three minutes each to speak their mind.
Eleven of the people, including several self-proclaimed animal rights activists, made emotional appeals to end horse racing in the state, citing the 25 deaths that have occurred at Santa Anita since Dec. 26.
Ten speakers spoke on behalf of racing, often citing the care that thoroughbreds receive and newly instituted changes that are making the sport safer.
Tensions between the sides reached a peak when jockey Norberto Arroyo Jr., speaking in support of the industry, referred to the anti-horse racing speakers as a group of "single women."
Nine of the 11 speaking in opposition of racing were women. Seven of the 10 speaking in favor of racing were men.
Another flashpoint in the discussion came when a speaker referred to Madeline Auerbach, CHRB vice chairwoman, as "unforgivingly ignorant."
Several of the animal rights speakers mentioned California's alleged complicity in allowing "horse slaughter" or selling horses for meat after their careers were over.
Chuck Winner, chairman of the CHRB, strongly pushed back, challenging anyone who had knowledge of a person brokering horses for slaughter to report them to the CHRB, where, if the claim had merit, the person would face felony charges.
The anti-horse racing speakers offered no evidence of current horse brokering in California, only citing historical information and saying that it exists.