Politics

/

ArcaMax

Editorial: When government has to subsidize people's property taxes, something is badly wrong

The Editorial Board, Chicago Tribune on

Published in Op Eds

How do you know property taxes are too high in this state?

Most homeowners if asked that question would laugh at the notion that there was any doubt. But there hardly could be starker evidence than that local politicians, led by Cook County Assessor Fritz Kaegi, are proposing to have taxpayers cough up more money — potentially lots of it — to help lower-income households cover their property tax bills.

Wait, you might say. Aren’t property taxes supposed to fund local government? Are you telling us that government now needs to find money to help pay a substantial slice of the property taxes that are meant to … well … fund the government? The irony couldn’t be richer.

But that’s where we are in Illinois, and more particularly in the south suburbs of Cook County, where homeowners recently suffered massive sticker shock when they opened their property tax bills. The median increase in that part of Cook County was nearly 20%, according to the county treasurer’s office. But the hikes were far steeper for many, adding thousands to their annual bill.

The reasons for the unusual spike are multifaceted, but essentially homeowners are bearing a significantly higher share of the burden to fund their schools, municipal governments and the county (among other taxing bodies) than used to be the case. Commercial property values generally have suffered since the pandemic while residential values have performed relatively well. Taxing bodies get their money no matter who pays what, so reductions for businesses mean increases for homeowners if, as is the case now, residential values hold steady or rise.

For the south and west suburbs, local governments approved $265 million more in property tax this year. Households are paying all of that increase and more, seeing their bills rise collectively by $400 million while commercial owners experienced a collective $122 million decline.

This frustrating zero-sum aspect of property taxes wouldn’t make for such a crisis if the tax levies themselves weren’t so high.

In recent weeks, Kaegi has said he’s putting together proposed state legislation that would establish a “circuit breaker” for households with low and modest incomes. If their taxes rose above a certain level, the rest of what they owed would be covered by a fund, established by the state, Cook County, or both. The assessor says this approach isn’t unusual; 29 states have some form of property tax circuit breaker. Until about a decade ago, Illinois provided one for low-income seniors. (The circuit breaker was distinct from and in addition to the senior exemptions, which still exist.)

The cost of subsidizing property tax bills in the south and west suburban region alone likely would be in the tens of millions, according to the assessor’s office, which says it will have a better idea of the price tag next month after it completes an analysis of that question. Similar residential spikes occurred in the north and northwest suburbs last year. Kaegi’s office is reassessing values in Chicago as we write, and there is trepidation around whether Chicago homeowners will see similar increases next year.

One can only imagine the cost for providing such relief throughout the Chicago region and even statewide. It’s not as if property tax stress is confined to Cook County.

 

The Cook County Board has discussed using late fees to help cover such a subsidy program — yet another irony, since those fees are largely the result of unaffordable tax bills in the first place. The county as of May collected $54 million in late fees, well above the $35 million that was projected. Another clear sign of the pain being felt.

It is certainly true that property tax bills in the south suburbs, which are home to a greater percentage of low-income residents than other parts of the region, constitute an emergency. Too many people could lose their homes because their property tax bills simply aren’t affordable.

So a governmental response is in order. Whether it’s the proposal Kaegi is putting together or some other relief, we’ll wait for the details to opine on the particulars.

But any meaningful response will cost big money, it’s clear. And the state government, which for decades has acknowledged that Illinois’ extraordinarily high property taxes (second only to New Jersey nationwide) are an issue, is likely to be the body voters and municipal officials look to for answers.

Last year, Gov. JB Pritzker signed a budget that imposed $900 million in new taxes, taking care to keep the vast bulk of that increase away from residents. But in so doing, Pritzker and fellow Democrats in the General Assembly used up most of the “painless” revenue options at their disposal. A moribund state economy, caused in no small part by a Chicago economy that’s stuck in the mud, is likely to mean more tough budgetary choices next year.

In 2025, Springfield already has to address a funding gap of something like $700 million for Chicago’s transit agencies. Now, it appears, Pritzker and company will be asked to provide another large sum, not for infrastructure or services or new programs, but simply to subsidize local residential tax bills. Who will be asked to foot the bill? Businesses already pay a state income tax that is among the highest in the nation.

In the absence of far more robust economic growth — and, yes, the state and local tax burden is a big reason Illinois’ economy is so lackluster — Democrats in Springfield, who enjoy supermajorities allowing them to call all the shots, need to face the reality that continuing to raise taxes and boost spending in this environment ultimately will lead to painfully deep cuts when the next recession hits. Their mindset needs to change fundamentally. Start trimming and prioritizing now.

They also need to think bigger about how to rely less on property taxes to finance the local government services — police, fire, schools, parks — felt most directly by Illinoisans. Kaegi’s coming circuit breaker proposal should be seen as a canary in a coal mine. The path we’re on right now is leading us deeper into the shaft.

_____


©2024 Chicago Tribune. Visit chicagotribune.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

 

Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Related Channels

ACLU

ACLU

By The ACLU
Amy Goodman

Amy Goodman

By Amy Goodman
Armstrong Williams

Armstrong Williams

By Armstrong Williams
Austin Bay

Austin Bay

By Austin Bay
Ben Shapiro

Ben Shapiro

By Ben Shapiro
Betsy McCaughey

Betsy McCaughey

By Betsy McCaughey
Bill Press

Bill Press

By Bill Press
Bonnie Jean Feldkamp

Bonnie Jean Feldkamp

By Bonnie Jean Feldkamp
Cal Thomas

Cal Thomas

By Cal Thomas
Christine Flowers

Christine Flowers

By Christine Flowers
Clarence Page

Clarence Page

By Clarence Page
Danny Tyree

Danny Tyree

By Danny Tyree
David Harsanyi

David Harsanyi

By David Harsanyi
Debra Saunders

Debra Saunders

By Debra Saunders
Dennis Prager

Dennis Prager

By Dennis Prager
Dick Polman

Dick Polman

By Dick Polman
Erick Erickson

Erick Erickson

By Erick Erickson
Froma Harrop

Froma Harrop

By Froma Harrop
Jacob Sullum

Jacob Sullum

By Jacob Sullum
Jamie Stiehm

Jamie Stiehm

By Jamie Stiehm
Jeff Robbins

Jeff Robbins

By Jeff Robbins
Jessica Johnson

Jessica Johnson

By Jessica Johnson
Jim Hightower

Jim Hightower

By Jim Hightower
Joe Conason

Joe Conason

By Joe Conason
Joe Guzzardi

Joe Guzzardi

By Joe Guzzardi
John Micek

John Micek

By John Micek
John Stossel

John Stossel

By John Stossel
Josh Hammer

Josh Hammer

By Josh Hammer
Judge Andrew Napolitano

Judge Andrew Napolitano

By Judge Andrew P. Napolitano
Laura Hollis

Laura Hollis

By Laura Hollis
Marc Munroe Dion

Marc Munroe Dion

By Marc Munroe Dion
Michael Barone

Michael Barone

By Michael Barone
Michael Reagan

Michael Reagan

By Michael Reagan
Mona Charen

Mona Charen

By Mona Charen
Oliver North and David L. Goetsch

Oliver North and David L. Goetsch

By Oliver North and David L. Goetsch
R. Emmett Tyrrell

R. Emmett Tyrrell

By R. Emmett Tyrrell
Rachel Marsden

Rachel Marsden

By Rachel Marsden
Rich Lowry

Rich Lowry

By Rich Lowry
Robert B. Reich

Robert B. Reich

By Robert B. Reich
Ruben Navarrett Jr

Ruben Navarrett Jr

By Ruben Navarrett Jr.
Ruth Marcus

Ruth Marcus

By Ruth Marcus
S.E. Cupp

S.E. Cupp

By S.E. Cupp
Salena Zito

Salena Zito

By Salena Zito
Star Parker

Star Parker

By Star Parker
Stephen Moore

Stephen Moore

By Stephen Moore
Susan Estrich

Susan Estrich

By Susan Estrich
Ted Rall

Ted Rall

By Ted Rall
Terence P. Jeffrey

Terence P. Jeffrey

By Terence P. Jeffrey
Tim Graham

Tim Graham

By Tim Graham
Tom Purcell

Tom Purcell

By Tom Purcell
Veronique de Rugy

Veronique de Rugy

By Veronique de Rugy
Victor Joecks

Victor Joecks

By Victor Joecks
Wayne Allyn Root

Wayne Allyn Root

By Wayne Allyn Root

Comics

Pat Bagley Dave Whamond Tom Stiglich Bob Englehart Joey Weatherford David M. Hitch