Politics, Moderate



Rewarding bad behavior is a recipe for worse

Steve Chapman on

Professional football involves systematic violence. On every play, men do things that would get them arrested in other contexts. What makes it a game -- rather than a brawl, a riot or deadly combat -- is that the violence is controlled.

There's a penalty for "unnecessary roughness" because roughness must be kept within certain limits. Some types of brutal contact are allowed, but others are forbidden.

Some forbidden ones were committed by Cleveland Browns defensive star Myles Garrett in a recent game against Pittsburgh. Having made a late hit on the Steelers' Mason Rudolph, which led to a scuffle with the quarterback, Garrett yanked Rudolph's helmet off and then struck him on the head with it.

Shocking incidents like this put a choice to the NFL: Deal leniently or sternly with the offender. The league could have decided that Garrett's ejection, coupled with a stiff fine and mandatory counseling, would suffice for his tantrum. Instead, it suspended him for the final six games of the season, and it gave no promise about when he will be reinstated. It thus sent Garrett a message that such outrageous conduct will not be tolerated.

But it also sent a strong message to all the players who get through each game without going berserk: that their stoic fortitude is recognized, respected and rewarded. To let Garrett off with a slap on the wrist would devalue their discipline. It would excuse bad behavior and generate more of it.

Donald Trump has a different attitude about punishing wrongdoers. He recently pardoned Clint Lorance, an Army officer convicted of ordering the murder of three Afghans, and Matthew Golsteyn, a Green Beret charged with murdering an Afghan prisoner.


Navy Secretary Richard Spencer was fired after Trump elected to reverse the demotion and preserve the SEAL Trident pin of Eddie Gallagher - who was prosecuted in a military court on charges of murder and other crimes, though he was convicted only of posing for a photo with a corpse. Trump justified his decision by tweeting, "We train our boys to be killing machines, then prosecute them when they kill!"

But even in war, some killings are not allowed. Trump's intervention drew sharp criticism from military leaders, notably former Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey and former Marine Corps commandant Gen. Charles Krulak.

Retired Army Col. Mike Jason, who led combat units in Iraq, Afghanistan and Kosovo, tweeted, "The decision to pardon these three men, countering the sanctity of the Uniformed Code of Military Justice, the decisions of commanders, the verdict of their peers, our adherence to the Laws of Warfare -- WILL have long lasting battlefield consequences."

These veterans know more of war than Trump does. It was Gallagher's fellow SEALs who accused him of crimes. Nine members of Lorance's unit testified against him. "It tainted our entire service," one of them told The New York Times. "Every time a new story calling him a hero happens, I don't sleep."


swipe to next page
Copyright 2019 Creators Syndicate, Inc.


blog comments powered by Disqus

Social Connections


Lee Judge Chris Britt John Deering Mike Lester Clay Bennett Mike Peters