In battle against COVID-19, what matters most is your ZIP code

It was the Golden State, under California Gov. Gavin Newsom, that led the country in issuing a "stay-at-home" order in early March. Not that Californians have proven to be very skilled at following orders; police officers now patrol the

beaches. Heaven forbid that a public health emergency should interfere with our leisure time.

If the nation can be described as one big family, Florida is the obnoxious unruly teenager who doesn't take anything seriously and thinks the rules don't apply to it. Gov. Ron DeSantis finally got onboard this week by issuing a statewide "stay-at-home" order, but he exempted churches and other houses of worship. Floridians might want to pray for better leaders.

Meanwhile, Washington state -- where the first cluster of COVID-19 cases appeared in early March, near Seattle -- seems to have benefited from strict adherence to social distancing protocols. Infection rates have leveled off.

Elsewhere, it's state vs. state. Rhode Island wants to keep out New Yorkers, while Florida is trying to stop people from entering from Louisiana. If you have out-of-state license plates, expect a state trooper to pull you over and ask you how you're feeling.

Trump wants the governors to take the lead in combating the virus. But, in a recent conference call with state leaders, Washington Gov. Jay Inslee told Trump in a conference call that the states need the federal government to call the plays.

The states should be careful what they wish for. People are now debating whether there should be a heavy-handed nationwide lockdown, if Americans don't get a lot better at keeping their distance -- and fast. Maybe there should be. The virus doesn't respect state boundaries. So why should those boundaries get in the way of public health?

Of course, local and state governments are better equipped to handle enforcement, hand out services, run hospitals, deal with the homeless, and do a bunch of other things that the federal government can't or won't do.

For the most part, Washington should defer to the localities; not the other way around.

This thinking is new for me. Before COVID-19, I was a federalist. Whether the issue was gay marriage or education reform, I thought the federal government should lead the way. I was dismissive of states' rights, and saw them as an excuse to discriminate or disenfranchise.

I was wrong. In combating the virus, states should have the full cooperation and support of the federal government. Uncle Sam should get them everything they need -- and then get out of the way.

========

Ruben Navarrette's email address is ruben@rubennavarrette.com. His daily podcast, "Navarrette Nation," is available through every podcast app.