From the Left

/

Politics

Democrats have indulged in a pro forma charade that will set an awful precedent

Ted Rall on

Donald Trump deserved to be impeached. He deserves to be convicted in the Senate.

Every president has committed high crimes and misdemeanors that could justify impeachment.

But not on these charges. Not for threatening to withhold $400 million in aid that we shouldn't have been sending to Ukraine in the first place, not as long as 38 million Americans are poor. Not for trying to dig up dirt on Joe and Hunter Biden; American voters have the right to know that the leading candidate for the Democratic nomination for president and his son are on the take.

Certainly not on the nonsensical count of contempt of Congress, which punished the president for the crime of using the legal system to defend himself.

Impeachment is a political process that only has legitimacy when it's bipartisan. In 1974, Democrats drafted wide-ranging articles of impeachment against Richard Nixon. They appealed to constituencies across a wide spectrum of interests: corruption, financial fraud, bribing witnesses not to testify, privacy violations, opposition to the Vietnam War.

The Nixon articles were crafted in order to attract support from Republicans. The media claims that the GOP has never been in thrall to a president as slavishly as it is to Trump, but people who remember Nixon know better. Still, Nixon's hold on Capitol Hill Republicans eroded as the latter realized they could no longer defend conduct like his wiretapping of and siccing the IRS on political opponents.

 

Speaker Nancy Pelosi's microaggression-based articles of impeachment against Trump couldn't peel away a single House Republican.

Here are the articles of impeachment I would have drafted instead.

No. 1: Racist foreign policy. President Donald J. Trump's comportment as head of state and top official in charge of foreign policy has brought shame, contempt and opprobrium upon the United States of America. He has used his Twitter feed and spoken comments in order to insult foreign heads of state and call them names. A brazen racist, he has referred to sovereign nations in Africa, and Haiti, as "shithole countries." If the U.S. should set the highest standard of conduct, Trump's sets the lowest, recklessly destroying our relationship with the world. Threatening to "totally destroy" North Korea, a nuclear power, is the kind of behavior that sparks conflicts. Few Republicans want another pointless war.

No. 2: The president may be psychotic. The president's temperament and demeanor not only fail to rise to the bar expected of the president but also bring disrepute upon the citizens of the United States he is tasked with representing. Anticipating the possibility that we might someday face a situation similar to that in England under King George III, the Founding Fathers conceived impeachment in large part as a way to remove a head of state who might be mentally ill, addicted to alcohol or other drugs or, in the flowery language of the time, indulge in "frequent and notorious excesses and debaucheries, and ... profane and atheistical discourses." A president not in full command of his mental faculties is an albatross; his tenure represents a threat to national security. Under the War Powers Act, the president has the right to deploy troops. He may decide whether a condemned prisoner is pardoned or executed. He can unilaterally order a nuclear attack without provocation. Although it is impossible to determine whether Trump is mentally ill or under the influence of narcotics, his behavior is so unsteady that it is only prudent to plan for the worst and remove him before he causes a catastrophe. Republicans know he is dangerous.

...continued

swipe to next page
Copyright 2019 Creators Syndicate, Inc.
 

Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus
 

Social Connections

Comics

Ken Catalino Chris Britt Mike Smith Bob Gorrell Tim Campbell Al Goodwyn