From the Left



How should we interpret Trump's reversal on his decision to fire Mueller?

Ruth Marcus on

WASHINGTON -- There are two ways to interpret the reports that President Trump ordered the firing of special counsel Robert Mueller last June and backed down only after his White House counsel threatened to resign.

The first is with guarded optimism: The episode shows that, although Trump is mercurial and blustery, his worst instincts can be contained, and that his ordinarily enabling staff can sometimes summon courage to do so.

The second is with dreadful foreboding: that Trump feels so threatened by the Russia probe that he's willing to take the most extreme steps to shut it down.

Right now, much as I hope to be proven wrong, my money is on dread. Not necessarily in the form of Mueller's dismissal -- that alone would not end the investigation -- but in the form of the more constitutionally fireproof tactic of mass pardons, potentially including Trump himself.

The case for seeing the Mueller non-firing as a bullet successfully dodged is that Trump, to employ one of the president's pet putdowns, is all talk, no action. We've all known people like this. They are paper tigers, ultimately impotent no matter how great their seeming power. They rage but retreat once their storm of fury has blown over. Everyone around them knows not to be too hasty in carrying out orders shouted in anger.

Further, this case would go, even Trump has learned that there are limits to how badly he can behave and consequences for violating them, much like a dog with a shock collar discovering the existence of an invisible fence.

Sponsored Video Stories from LifeZette

"The saddest thing is that because I'm the president of the United States, I am not supposed to be involved with the Justice Department," Trump told conservative radio host Larry O'Connor last November.

By definition, the obstruction prong of Mueller's inquiry rests on a series of self-inflicted wounds involving Trump's failure to heed that advice. Of those, the greatest blunder was the move to fire FBI Director James Comey. Is Trump, to switch pet metaphors, really ready to jump back on that hot stove? If he did not understand back in June why firing Mueller would be such a mistake, surely he gets it now.

So maybe we should all calm down. Except, this is Trump. Nothing in his response to the Russia investigation has been rational, which augurs continued irrationality. Or, perhaps, desperate self-preservation.

One potential way to understand Trump is that he always tries to get away with what he thinks he can get away with: when you're a star, and all that. Within that framework, Trump's itch to fire Mueller, and his eventual capitulation to cooler heads, has to be understood in the context of when it happened, last June.


swipe to next page


blog comments powered by Disqus

--Ads from Google--

Social Connections


Steve Breen Tim Campbell Gary Varvel Steve Benson Chris Britt Signe Wilkinson