From the Left

/

Politics

Gen. Kelly, women should be seen as equal, not 'sacred'

Ruth Marcus on

WASHINGTON -- John Kelly had me at the ice. He lost me at the women.

Standing at the podium, in a briefing room that has rarely been so hushed, the White House chief of staff described how the bodies of fallen soldiers are packed in ice, not once but twice, to preserve them on their journey home. Soldiers, he could have said but didn't need to, like his son, Second Lt. Robert Kelly, killed in Afghanistan at age 29.

So I was mesmerized and, to be honest, a bit teary-eyed as the retired four-star general spoke of what it is like to be on the early-morning receiving end of the news that would break any parent's heart.

And I was not prepared, or disposed, to be taken aback by some of what came next -- in particular, Kelly's disquisition on the loss of the sacred:

"You know when I was a kid growing up, a lot of things were sacred in our country. Women were sacred, looked upon with great honor. That's obviously not the case anymore as we've seen from recent cases. Life -- the dignity of life -- is sacred. That's gone. Religion, that seems to be gone as well. Gold Star families, I think that left in the convention over the summer."

Kelly was on a rhetorical detour here. His main point, fair or not, was that Florida Democratic Rep. Frederica Wilson had violated the sanctity of a private phone call between commander in chief and a grieving family when she listened in on an exchange and then blasted President Trump for alleged insensitivity.

Still, it is worth exploring this riff in light of Kelly's prominence and the current circumstances.

My first reaction, and I doubt I was alone here, was along the lines of: Seriously, you're going THERE? Leave aside the references to "dignity of life." If Kelly was talking about abortion rights, he can talk to the Supreme Court. Leave aside Kelly's lament for religion, which "seems to be gone as well." How's that, except maybe if you're a Muslim refugee? I doubt Kelly had that in mind.

Leave aside, too, the puzzling reference to Gold Star families. Was Kelly criticizing Khizr Khan for speaking at the Democratic National Convention about his dead son and Donald Trump's assault on the Constitution -- or was this a sly dig at Trump's attack on the Khans? "Left in the convention" suggests the former, in which case Kelly should know better. A Gold Star family has the right to hold its grief close, as Kelly has, but it also has the right, when the values for which a child had given his life are under assault, to speak out. Both approaches honor the dead.

But about those women. Um, General Kelly, assuming you were referring to the report on Harvey Weinstein -- where were you, exactly, during the presidential campaign? The president you serve -- and I respect all the reasons for that service -- was shown on videotape bragging about using his star power to get away with grabbing women by their private parts -- and he didn't phrase that in a way that showed the respect you think women deserve.

...continued

swipe to next page
 

Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus
 

Social Connections

Comics

Signe Wilkinson Chip Bok Chris Britt Gary Markstein Darrin Bell Nick Anderson