The danger of dynastic wealth
Rich millennials will soon acquire much more of the nation's wealth.
America is now on the cusp of the largest inter-generational transfer of wealth in history. As wealthy baby boomers expire, an estimated $30 trillion will go to their children over the next three decades.
Those children will be able to live off of the income these assets generate, and then leave the bulk of these assets -- which in the intervening years will have grown far more valuable -- to their own heirs, tax-free.
After a few generations of this, almost all of the nation's wealth will be in the hands of a few thousand families.
Dynastic wealth runs counter to the ideal of America as a meritocracy. It makes a mockery of the notions that people earn what they're worth in the market, and that economic gains should go to those who deserve them.
It puts economic power into the hands of a relative small number of people who have never worked, but whose investment decisions will have a significant effect on the nation's future.
And it creates a self-perpetuating aristocracy that is antithetical to democracy.
The last time America faced anything comparable to the concentration of wealth we face now was at the turn of the last century.
Then, President Teddy Roosevelt warned that "a small class of enormously wealthy and economically powerful men, whose chief object is to hold and increase their power," could destroy American democracy.
Roosevelt's answer was to tax wealth. He advocated for the establishment of an estate tax. The modern U.S. estate tax was established in 1916, less than a decade after Roosevelt's presidency ended, and the capital gains tax was established in 1922.
But since then, both have been eroded. As the rich have accumulated greater wealth, they have also amassed more political power, and they've used that political power to reduce their taxes.
Roosevelt, a Republican, helped create a movement against dynastic wealth. Trump and today's congressional Republicans will not follow in his footsteps. I doubt even today's Democrats would do so if they had a chance. Big money has become too powerful on both sides of the aisle.
But taxing big wealth is necessary if we're ever to get our democracy back and make our economy work for everyone rather than for a privileged few.
If Cohn and his boss cared about America's future, they'd raises taxes on great wealth. Roosevelt's fear of an American aristocracy is more applicable today than ever before.
(Robert Reich, a former U.S. Secretary of Labor, is professor of public policy at the University of California at Berkeley and the author of "Saving Capitalism: For the Many, Not the Few," now available in paperback. His new film, "Inequality for All," is now out on Amazon, DVD and On Demand. His daily blog is at www.facebook.com/RBReich/.)