From the Left

/

Politics

Give Mueller the mic

Eugene Robinson on

WASHINGTON -- It's Mueller time.

We need public, no-holds-barred testimony before Congress by special counsel Robert Mueller, and we need it now. As we saw Wednesday, trying to get the truth out of Attorney General William Barr is like squeezing blood from a stone.

Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee did wring out a few droplets. Thanks to Sen. Kamala Harris of California -- the last person any defendant should want to see at the prosecution table -- we learned that Barr did not even look at the voluminous evidence underlying Mueller's report before exonerating President Trump of obstruction of justice. Barr did this despite the line in Mueller's report making clear that the evidence "does not exonerate" the president.

Harris also caused Barr to stammer and stumble when she asked whether Trump or anyone in the White House had ever asked him to investigate anyone; Barr didn't say yes but didn't say no. And questioning by other committee members revealed that Barr's cavalier dismissal of one of the clearest acts of obstruction by the president -- telling Don McGahn, then White House counsel, to have Mueller fired -- rests on a laughable, made-up distinction Barr pretends to draw between "firing" and "removing" someone.

Given how he has misled the public and Congress, Barr should be, um, removed. But, of course, Trump won't do that. In Barr he has the attorney general of his dreams, a personal advocate who puts loyalty above duty and honor. If Barr had nothing to hide, he'd be delighted to face extended questioning by staff attorneys for the House Judiciary Committee. Instead, when Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., convened the committee Thursday, he sat across from an empty chair.

You don't have to take my word that Barr was dishonest about the Mueller report. Take Mueller's word, in the letter of complaint he sent to Barr on March 27: "The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this office's work and conclusions."

Sponsored Video Stories

The full report, minus redactions, was eventually released -- but only after Barr had preemptively decided to ignore its substantial evidence of an effective partnership between the Trump campaign and the Russians, as well as its overwhelming evidence that Trump committed multiple acts of obstruction after taking office.

"It was my baby," Barr said, referring to the Mueller report, not our infantile president. But the report actually belongs to the American people, and while some Republican members of Congress refuse to read it, I hope their constituents do. It shows that Trump and those around him are chronic, venal liars who disgrace the White House and dishonor the nation.

Mueller's letter of quiet outrage, which Barr described as "snitty," suggests that the special counsel's view of the import of his findings differs substantially from Barr's. And that is why the nation needs to hear directly from Mueller.

Barr said his reaction to Mueller's letter was to protest, "Bob, what's with the letter? Why don't you just pick up the phone and call me if there's an issue?"

...continued

swipe to next page
 

Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus
 
 

Social Connections

Comics

Mike Peters Mike Luckovich Clay Bennett Mike Smith Chris Britt Brian Duffy