From the Left



When Trump needs a Friend, this is what 'Fox & Friends' is for

Dana Milbank on

First came Johns Hopkins professor Wendy Osefo. She replied that the issue was "beyond monuments" and more about Nazis killing and beating people. "This is not talking points," she said. "This is human life."

Huntsman turned to Gianno Caldwell, a black Republican and reliable Trump defender. "I mean, there are good people on both sides of this debate," she coaxed.

Caldwell wasn't having it: "President Trump, our president, has literally betrayed the conscience of our country, the very moral fabric in which we've made progress when it comes to race relations in America. He's failed us. ... Mr. President, good people don't pal around with Nazis and white supremacists."

Huntsman, after trying one more time to talk about statues, gave up: "You know, it's a tough debate."

It's not a tough debate. It's not a debate at all. There are Nazis, and there are the rest of us.

It was obscene and unthinkable that the president of the United States let white supremacists know it's OK to hold and act on their hateful views. In defending Trump, Fox is further encouraging these racists to crawl out from under their rocks and preach in the open.

A Huffington Post/YouGov poll shows the effect. Only 22 percent think Trump is opposed to white nationalism. And when the president winks at racism, more racists are emboldened. Among Trump supporters, 48 percent think the white nationalists in Charlottesville were mostly right or went too far but have a point. Half of Trump supporters, thus given the green light by the president, express sympathy for white nationalists. That is, to coin a term, deplorable.

But it's happening. In the 7 a.m. hour, Trump's Fox friends continued their Trump defense.

"Not everyone there was out to hurt someone or was evil," Huntsman said, adding that, even so, it's "incredibly important" to call out bigotry and hatred.

"Which he did," Doocy interjected.

"Which he did," Huntsman agreed.

To their credit, the hosts interviewed, near the end of the show, conservative pundit Rich Lowry, with a dissent. When Doocy again raised the prospect of Washington becoming the next victim after Robert E. Lee, Lowry explained that "there's a huge historical and moral difference" between the first president and the Confederate commander. Lowry said Lee probably would have wanted his statue taken down, because "he wanted to put the Civil War behind us and focus on national unity."

Would that Trump and his "friends" could do the same.


Follow Dana Milbank on Twitter, @Milbank.

(c) 2017, Washington Post Writers Group



blog comments powered by Disqus

--Sponsored Video--

Social Connections


Mike Luckovich Signe Wilkinson Clay Bennett Gary Varvel Andy Marlette Steve Benson