A Health Care Race Card from the Right

By Clarence Page, Tribune Media Services on Aug 16, 2009

By clicking submit, I authorize Arcamax and its affiliates to: (1) use, sell, and share my information for marketing purposes, including cross-context behavioral advertising, as described in our Privacy Policy , (2) add to information that I provide with other information like interests inferred from web page views, or data lawfully obtained from data brokers, such as past purchase or location data, or publicly available data, (3) contact me or enable others to contact me by email or other means with offers for different types of goods and services, and (4) retain my information while I am engaging with marketing messages that I receive and for a reasonable amount of time thereafter. I understand I can opt out at any time through an email that I receive, or by clicking here

I thought slavery reparations were a dead issue by now. Glenn Beck set me straight.

The radio talk show host and Fox News Channel star says President Obama's proposed health care overhaul is really "stealth reparations," a form of racial payback in Beck's world by another name.

I am not making this up. On his radio program last month and in a video floating around the Web, Beck argues that Obama's announced opposition to reparations is only a smoke screen for his "stealth" support.

How does Beck know? Through his own tortured logic, he takes Obama's argument for color-blind alternatives to color-conscious concepts like reparations and affirmative action and turns the argument on its head. He is happy that Obama opposes reparations, Beck says, but he dislikes Obama's reasons for opposing it.

Try to follow Beck's logic here. It's not easy.

When asked about reparations and affirmative action during his presidential campaign, Obama said he preferred programs that targeted poverty, education and other social problems based on need, not color. Beck correctly quotes Obama as saying programs like "universal health care ... will disproportionately affect people of color because they are disproportionately uninsured."

The same is true for programs aimed at improving education, housing and job opportunities. Obama's reasoning is hardly in dispute. Polls and the November election show that Obama's belief in helping those who are most in need regardless of race, creed or color is the sort of common-sense approach social policy that most Americans support across political party lines.

In fact, since low-income whites outnumber low-income blacks overall, even though a higher percentage of blacks are in poverty, more whites would receive help than other Americans would.

Yet Beck insists that Obama is pushing "universal healthcare, universal college, green jobs as stealth reparations." Why would Obama do that? Because, says Beck, "It's a much less obvious route to reparations."

Less obvious? You've got me there, Glenn. Your conspiracy theory makes about as much sense as the 98-pound boxer who hopes to beat Mike Tyson by tiring him out.

Beck is not alone in his twisted logic. Rush Limbaugh, the Big Kahuna of conservative radio talkers, declared in a June 22 broadcast that Obama's "entire economic program is reparations," although he did not explain why he things that way. The mere mention of the R-word is enough in Limbaugh's logic to condemn Obama's "wealth redistribution."

How can something as quaint as mere facts or logic stand a chance against eyes that are determined to see racial preferences in programs carefully designed to eliminate racial preferences?

Do such not-so-subtle race cards have an effect? One example may be Richie Drake, a disabled sheet rock installer in Bristol, Va. He was unemployed and his children were on Medicaid, yet he told a National Public Radio reporter in a local coffee shop last month that he wants no part of the Obama overhaul. "Minorities are going to get more attention than the whites and stuff like that," he said. "That's the way I take it from what the news was talking about."

Add to Drake's misimpressions the rising prominence this summer of the birthers, who insist against all evidence that Obama may not be a natural-born citizen.

Add the "tea party" protesters who appear to have reemerged to help disrupt town halls intended to answer health care questions.

Amid the headline-making mayhem, one can be forgiven for thinking Obama's lofty vision of a post-racial, post-partisan presidency in "not Red State or Blue State but the United States of America" seems to have gone the way of twice-a-day mail delivery.

Still I am an optimist. Just beneath the noise of town hall protesters there's a real health care debate going on. It is only hard to separate the folks who have legitimate questions from those who are intent on re-fighting last year's election campaign.

In the meantime, if there is any justice regarding the broadcast demagogues, it could be in the reported departure of about dozen companies who have withdrawn their commercials from Beck's Fox News program. The mass exodus reportedly came after he said on that channel last month that Obama was a racist with a "deep-seated hatred for white people or the white culture." Again, Beck had more innuendo than evidence to back up the charge.

It is encouraging sometimes to see confirmation of my parents' warning: If you keep throwing mud, some of it is going to splash back on you.

========

E-mail Clarence Page at cpage(at)tribune.com, or write to him c/o Tribune Media Services, 2225 Kenmore Ave., Suite 114, Buffalo, NY 14207.