Home & Leisure

University of Missouri loses suit over records of dogs and cats used in research

MarĂ¡ Rose Williams, The Kansas City Star on

Published in Cats & Dogs News

KANSAS CITY, Mo. -- A Boone County, Mo., judge has ruled that University of Missouri violated the state's open records law by placing an exorbitantly high price tag on records sought by a California animal rescue group.

When the Beagle Freedom Project requested MU records on 179 cats and dogs that the school used in medical research, the university said the documents would cost $82,000.

The group, sued the university in 2016, claiming the cost was "prohibitively high" and "violates the Missouri Sunshine Law." It alleged the high cost effectively would prevent public access to the information.

The group had sought the records as part of an awareness campaign that would put a face to the animals used in research by various institutions.

As part of the court ruling, MU was fined $1,000.

The court ruling means "that we can submit for future animal records and not be stonewalled by ridiculous, outrageous prices for documents that we are entitled to have," said Shannon Keith, president and founder of Beagle Freedom Project.


In a statement released Monday, the university said it is committed to being transparent and in compliance with the law. "We respond to nearly 700 Sunshine requests per year and devote significant resources to live up to the requirements of the Sunshine Law," the statement said. "We respectfully disagree that the University violated those requirements. We respect the court and are reviewing the decision in detail and will determine our options following that review."

The ruling did not direct MU to provide the documents to Beagle Freedom Project, said Christian Basi, university spokesman. He said the university has not heard from the group since the ruling.

"Unfortunately at this point, years later, those documents now are irrelevant," Keith said. "Those animals already have been killed."

Over the summer, university officials had reviewed the lawsuit and learned that the documents the group wanted were not as extensive as the university had originally thought, Basi said. Therefore the cost would be significantly less. The cost was based on estimates for digging up and making copies of documents, photos and videos.


swipe to next page


blog comments powered by Disqus