"I can't imagine anyone complaining about a first responder helping their pet," Kerr said.
Kerr said he helped train a group of first responders at UC Davis with scenarios involving animals in traffic accidents. Ultimately it was decided that SB 1305 would have a clause indemnifying first responders who render aid to an injured or sick pet. It does not require first responders to treat an animal.
"This has come up before," Kerr said. "It's the first time I know of where vets and first responders sat down together. As a director on the fire district board I come into contact with fire staff all the time, including the union president. They want to help animals and they usually do. We want to be able to offer treatment. We don't want anyone to hesitate. We have trained paramedics (to treat people). Now we're just applying it to animals.
Glazer is optimistic the bill will become law. For one thing, it has bipartisan support (fancy political talk for "cats and dogs living together"). Co-authors of the bill include Assembly Democrats Sabrina Cervantes (Riverside) and Kevin Mullin (South San Francisco), and Assembly Republicans Catharine Baker (Dublin) and Marc Steinorth (Rancho Cucamonga).
For another thing, Glaser was co-author of the Pets in Hot Cars bill which became law Jan. 1 of this year. That bill, also a bipartisan effort, allows bystanders to break a window of a vehicle in which an animal appears to be in a life-threatening situation due to severe heat -- as long as the bystander calls 911 first.
Sponsored Video Stories from LifeZette
And about that mouth-to-snout treatment, it's really a thing and it really works. Just ask a pet near you.
(c)2018 The Mercury News (San Jose, Calif.)
Visit The Mercury News (San Jose, Calif.) at www.mercurynews.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.