CoolSculpting not a health solution, just an aesthetic one
DEAR DR. ROACH: I would like to know your opinion regarding "cool sculpting." Does it really work? Are there any bad consequences that a person should know about it? Is it advisable for a person in her 80s who is in good health and is not overweight but is beginning to add fat around her middle? -- L.S.
ANSWER: CoolSculpting is a branded medical device that uses cold temperatures and vacuum to cause the death of fat cells. Over months, this can create a reduction in discrete areas of subcutaneous fat. This process, cryoablation, is related to liposuction. It is designed to remove fat and improve body appearance. It is not effective at removing large amounts of fat for overall health. A 2013 study found the procedure to be safe and well-tolerated, with an overall 73 percent patient satisfaction rate.
The negative effects seem minimal, with a few people getting additional fat growth in the treated areas, and others developing nodules under the skin. Redness, bruising and numbness are common and temporary.
By contrast, the amount of fat removed by traditional liposuction is greater than that removed by cryoablation, so the optimal procedure depends on the individual's goals.
A person in her 80s certainly can be interested in her appearance, and cryoablation offers an alternative for an aesthetic procedure. However, I don't advise it as a means of improving health, only for improving appearance.
DEAR DR. ROACH: I just had my yearly physical exam and am concerned about my kidney test results. Last October, my GFR was 38; in February, 43. My most recent is 39. I have seen a kidney specialist and a kidney nutritionist, and thought I was eating correctly. I am mystified as to why my GFR went down. I drink 2 liters of water per day and rarely any other liquids, other than a glass of wine or two a month. I am eating vegan (no meat, fish, fowl or dairy) about 98 percent of the time. I do consume vegan cheese and mayo on my daily large salad. I also eat lots of tofu and fruit. I eat no beans (except soybeans), nuts or seeds, as recommended by my kidney specialist. I was a vegetarian for 28 years before becoming nearly vegan last year. I eat two eggs once every week or two. What else can you suggest I do to change my diet so that my GFR improves? At this time, I don't plan on doing dialysis or a transplant, so when my kidneys are done, so am I. I am currently 75 years young. -- L.G.
ANSWER: While I can understand that you see a drop from February until now, your GFR (glomerular filtration rate, the basic number for kidney function) is actually improved from last year. These numbers often bounce up and down a little bit, depending on fluid status at the time you took the test (including whether you were fasting). Three points isn't enough to make a determination of whether the GFR is really decreasing; however, your values are on the low side, even for your age.
As far as diet, changing animal protein to plant protein does seem to slow the loss of kidney function (some loss is inevitable with age). Two liters of water is sufficient for all but the most active adults. If you take medications, the doses should be evaluated to be sure they are right for you: Some may need to be decreased.
READERS: Diabetes has become epidemic in North America. The booklet on it provides insight on its diagnosis and treatment. Readers can order a copy by writing: