Current News



Supreme Court to weigh Pennsylvania, New Jersey challenge to Trump efforts to roll back birth control mandate

Jeremy Roebuck, The Philadelphia Inquirer on

Published in News & Features

The U.S. Supreme Court will review a Philadelphia federal judge's decision last year to block new Trump administration rules that would have let almost any employer deny female workers no-cost birth control coverage by citing religious and moral objections.

In an order late Friday, the justices said they would consider an appeal from White House lawyers, who lost a previous bid to overturn a nationwide injunction imposed by U.S. District Judge Wendy Beetlestone in January 2019.

The case marks the third time this small but hotly contested portion of the former President Obama's signature health care law has drawn high court scrutiny. But it is the first time that the court's new majority of Republican appointees -- including Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh -- will hear a contraception case.

At issue now is a Trump administration push in 2017 to expand exemptions to the Affordable Care Act's "birth control mandate" with new regulations that would allow all but publicly traded companies, including private colleges and universities that issue student health plans, to opt out on moral grounds.

The attorney generals of Pennsylvania and New Jersey challenged the proposal, saying the rule change could saddle their states with the cost of dealing with thousands of unplanned pregnancies and as many as 127,000 women losing access to no-cost contraception.

A unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit agreed in May, affirming Beetlestone's earlier decision.


"Two federal courts have blocked this rule and we are confident the Supreme Court of the United States will do the same," Josh Shapiro, the Pennsylvania attorney general, said in a statement. If allowed to move forward, he added, the proposed regulation would allow employers to deny contraception coverage for "almost any reason -- including the belief that women don't belong in the workforce."

But the Little Sisters of the Poor, an order of Roman Catholic nuns that intervened in the Pennsylvania and New Jersey case, argue that they should not be forced to provide coverage at odds with their religious beliefs.

"It is disappointing to think that as we enter a new decade we must still defend our ministry in court," said Sister Loraine Marie Maguire, mother provincial of the order in the United States. "We are grateful the Supreme Court has decided to weigh in, and hopeful that the justices will reinforce their previous decision and allow us to focus on our lifelong work."

In crafting her opinion last year, Beetlestone concluded that the Trump administration's proposed regulations ran counter to both government rule-making procedures and the intent of Congress when it crafted the Affordable Care Act's contraception provisions. What's more, she cited the undue financial burden on states that moved in to pick up the tab.


swipe to next page


blog comments powered by Disqus