Michael Hiltzik: In blow to Uber, UK court reaches obvious conclusion that its drivers are employees

Michael Hiltzik, Los Angeles Times on

Published in Business News

Uber and its fellow gig economy firms have been very successful in the U.S. at kicking up dust over whether their drivers are employees or — as the companies assert — independent contractors.

The highest court in Britain wasn't fooled. In a unanimous ruling issued Friday, the U.K. Supreme Court found that Uber's estimated 65,000 drivers in London are unmistakably employees. That renders the drivers eligible for a minimum wage and paid vacation.

The court further ruled that the drivers' work time covers the entire period when they're logged on to Uber's app and therefore "on call" to pick up passengers.

Uber customarily considers drivers to be working only when they're on their way to pick up a rider and ferrying that rider to his or her destination.

The minimum wage in Britain, which is keyed to a worker's age and experience, runs as high as the equivalent of about $11.50 an hour. The ruling makes the drivers who brought the case eligible for back pay, which a lawyer for the plaintiffs said could come to an average of about $16,800.

In the most immediate terms, the ruling is a blow to Uber's business model in Britain. As in the U.S., that model depends on treating drivers as independent contractors and sticking them with expenses such as fuel, insurance and vehicle maintenance that would normally be covered by employers in a standard work relationship.


But it may also become a model for regulators elsewhere in Europe and beyond. The case may also forestall any effort by Uber to replicate overseas the egregious Proposition 22. That's the California ballot proposition that placed Uber and other gig companies outside the reach of California labor law, which had held that the drivers were employees.

Uber, Lyft and other gig companies spent a stupendous $205 million in their successful campaign to pass Proposition 22 in November, making it the most expensive ballot campaign in American history. Proposition 22 effectively deprives Uber's California drivers of such employment benefits as the minimum wage, workers' compensation and unemployment coverage and the right to unionize.

The ruling may undercut Uber's nascent campaign to persuade European lawmakers to conjure up a hybrid classification for workers — not quite employees, and not mere independent contractors.

In a white paper published days before the court ruling, Uber called on Europeans "to set a new standard for platform work ... one where having access to protections and benefits doesn't come at the cost of flexibility and of job creation."


swipe to next page
©2021 Los Angeles Times. Visit at Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.