Business

/

ArcaMax

Starbucks delivery drivers in Midwest in labor dispute

Dee DePass, Star Tribune (Minneapolis) on

Published in Business News

MINNEAPOLIS -- Teamster truckers and warehouse workers who supply food, coffee and paper goods to 900 Starbucks stores in Minnesota and three other states are still working to negotiate an extension to a labor contract that expired months ago, union officials said.

However, any food shortages at stores are unrelated to the labor dispute, union and Starbuck officials said.

Some 300 Teamsters Local 710 members voted last month to authorize a strike against DPI Specialty Foods. But to date no strike actions have taken place and contract talks continue, Teamster officials said Tuesday.

While some customers in the Twin Cities have cited a shortage of food products, spokesman Erik Moser said Starbucks was not aware that any allocation issues in Minnesota.

Food shortages in Starbucks stores in the Chicago area had caused consumers to grumble and generated headlines, but officials said the labor dispute and the food supplies were two separate issues. DPI has not missed deliveries, Moser said.

Moser acknowledged there were some supply "allocation" problems in Illinois that had left some Starbucks stores with too much of one product and not enough of another. "Now that has equaled out," he said, adding that the "allocation issue was quickly cleared up in Chicago."

 

The labor contract in question covers about 300 DPI truck drivers and warehouse workers who supply Starbucks in the metro areas around Chicago, Minneapolis, St. Louis and Indianapolis. About eight to 10 DPI drivers whose home base is Minnesota are affected by the contract talks, union officials said.

DPI officials in Minneapolis and Chicago did not return phone calls seeking comment.

Teamsters Local 710 Secretary Mike Cales said in a statement that his DPI workers usually get a multiyear labor contract, but the company now wants a seven-month instead of a five-year term.

"This extremely short contract is one of the reasons why our members voted it down," he said.

...continued

swipe to next page
 

Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus