As new market booms, which meat alternative will win out?

Kristen Leigh Painter, Star Tribune (Minneapolis) on

Published in Business News

The past year has given rise to a plethora of alternative-meat companies that fall into different segments and claim different advantages over regular meat and each other.

Beyond Meat and Impossible make fake meat from non-animal ingredients. Cultured meat is grown in a lab from the cells of animals. Blended-meat products, like Applegate's Blend Burger or Mighty Spark's Southwest Chicken Patty, aim to reduce the amount of meat in a product by mixing in vegetables, beans and nuts.

And then there is the regenerative-agriculture movement, led by firms like White Oak Pastures, Harris' Georgia-based company that supplies meat to Epic Provisions, a General Mills brand. Such producers rotate animal grazing and take other steps that some said more than offset the carbon cost of raising an animal on a farm.

The more that industry creates new, exciting options, the more consumers will experiment, Demeritt said. "People are looking for a diversity of choices because they are eating (protein) so much," she said.

Vegetarianism and veganism rates remain relatively flat, while consumer willingness to swap out some meat for some plant-based options is growing. But advances in food technology have led to a flood of new options that are moving the segment far beyond the old black-bean or garden burger.

The lab-raised meat category attracted three times more investment capital, about $50 million, in 2018 than the year before, according to the Good Food Institute, an interest group advancing cell-based and plant-based meat alternatives. Minnetonka-based Cargill Inc., one of the world's largest meat processors, has invested in two cell-based meat startups, Memphis Meats and Aleph Farms.


Meanwhile, sales of plant-based meat alternatives grew 9.1% in the year ended May 19, according to SPINS, a Chicago-based consumer data firm that specializes in specialty and natural foods.

Proponents for both lab-raised and plant-based meat products said they provide a way to eat meat -- or a meat-like substance -- without contributing to the high greenhouse gas emissions commonly associated with traditional livestock farming.

Meanwhile, advocates of regenerative grazing said their product, when raised using the best practices, goes a step further by actually creating a carbon net-negative.

Harris points out that a recently completed life-cycle analysis by independent-research firm Quantis found that White Oak Pastures contributed a negative 3.5 kilograms of carbon for every kilogram of meat produced, while the Impossible Burger was a net emitter. But a separate life-cycle analysis by the same research firm found Impossible Burger reduced other environmental loads, including water use and methane emissions from cattle.


swipe to next page


blog comments powered by Disqus

--Ads from Google--

Social Connections


Ginger Meggs Dogs of C-Kennel Darrin Bell John Deering David M. Hitch Chris Britt