Get these FREE informative newsletters in your email!

Weird News Trivia Jokes

See all of our Entertainment newsletters & columns on the subscribe page.

Type your email address:

Your email address is safe with us. View our Privacy policy.

Quizzes
The Zodiac and You:
Find out all about the zodiac and your astrological sign.

The Funnies:
Get free jokes, comics, and more! See them all on
our funnies page
Books:
Read the classics online or by email. More details on the books page

Examiner defends points for profanity

LONDON (UPI) -- A chief examiner for Britain's General Certificate of General Education English tests has defended his practice of awarding points for proper profanity use.

The work of Peter Buckroyd, chief examiner of English for the Assessment and Qualifications Alliance, and trainee examiners has come under scrutiny after it was revealed a student was awarded points for spelling and successfully conveying a meaning after answering a written essay question with a profane word for fornication followed by the word "off," The Times of London reported Monday.

Buckroyd said the answer -- which was given in response to an exam question instructing students to "Describe the room you're sitting in" -- met the requirements for minimum marks, including demonstrating "some simple sequencing of ideas" and "some words in appropriate order."

The student received two points out of 27, but could have gotten more if he had punctuated the response.

"It would be wicked to give it zero, because it does show some very basic skills we are looking for -- like conveying some meaning and some spelling," Buckroyd said. "It's better than someone that doesn't write anything at all. It shows more skills than somebody who leaves the page blank."



Copyright 2008 by United Press International

This news arrived on: 07/01/2008
Share this Story
Digg   del.icio.us   Yahoo   Facebook   Google   

Printer Friendly Version | Send this page to a friend | Post Comment


Rate This Story:

Great - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 - Bad




Posted Comments:

07-03-2008 08:26
stalbertmini wrote:

points for profanity

"It would be wicked to give it zero, because it does show some very basic skills we are looking for -- like conveying some meaning and some spelling," Buckroyd said. "It's better than someone that doesn't write anything at all. It shows more skills than somebody who leaves the page blank."

I might have had some understanding for the two marks had the questions not been "Describe the room you're sitting it". To my mind, leaving the blank page would have been more descriptive than those two words which convey no description and don't particularly highlight spelling skills.




Comment archive | Comment FAQ's

Post Comment::

Author:
Subject:



Recent archives Featured news

View Weird News ezine stories by date or visit the complete archive

Featured Channel: Politics

The ArcaMax Politics channel is one of 70 content categories offered by ArcaMax Publishing on this ...